Answer:
yes, it is equivalent!!
Step-by-step explanation:
6(3x + 1) = 18x + 6
9x + 6 + 9x combined will also equal 18x + 6
Let x = # of original members
Cost per person (originally) = 832/x
Cost per person after 6 more people = 832/(x+6)
Solve 832/x=832/(x+6) +6 (because the cost was reduced by 6
Solve for x.
x = 26 or -32 (but x is number of members, so it can't be negative)
# of original members is 26.
Original cost is 832/26 = $32 per person.
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Proof:</u>
<em>2</em><em> </em><em>(</em><em> </em><em>x </em><em>-</em><em> </em><em>9</em><em>)</em><em> </em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>-</em><em> </em><em>1</em><em>0</em><em> </em><em> </em><em>when </em><em>x </em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>4</em>
<em>2</em><em> </em><em>(</em><em> </em><em>4</em><em> </em><em>-</em><em> </em><em>9</em><em>)</em><em> </em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>-</em><em>1</em><em>0</em>
<em>8</em><em> </em><em>-</em><em> </em><em>1</em><em>8</em><em> </em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>-</em><em>1</em><em>0</em>
<em><u>-</u></em><em><u>1</u></em><em><u>0</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>=</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>-</u></em><em><u>1</u></em><em><u>0</u></em><em><u> </u></em>..........hence proven
<u>Reasons </u>
- When you replace X with 4, you can clearly see that the equation is equal to -10.
sorry I couldn't answer accurately, but I hope this helps
Answer:
n(A)= 10
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope it is ..mark me as brilliant
Answer:
No, it is not.
Step-by-step explanation:
comparing the two given values, 1.75 and 6, estimating 1.75 for 6 is not reasonable. This is due to the fact that converting 1.75 to the nearest whole number gives 2 which is far away from 6. Since,
6 - 2 = 4
So, estimating 1.75 for 6 would involve a large value of error. Which make it unreasonable. It would have been more reasonable to estimate 1.75 for 2.
