Answer:
The correct option is C: Grayson-Himes Pay for Performance Act
Explanation:
The bill was passed in 2009 was aimed at prohibiting some compensation to employees at some organization that were under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. This was done to help these financial institutions. It was an amendment to the executive compensation provisions of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.
Answer:
inconsistency
Explanation:
In argument or logic, inconsistency often referred as internal contradiction or logical inconsistency is a term of a fallacious argument, whereby two or more propositions are asserted that cannot both possibly be true.
Hence, in this case, being described as voluble, verbose, long winded and loquacious is contradictory to being described as an individual who has never utter more than twelve words sentence before.
Therefore the argument is rather considered as Inconsistency
Answer:
In the understanding of this court case, where the plaintiff (L.M.) filed a lawsuit against Pacheco on sexual abuse, the court ruled that the perpetration of the abhorrent act committed did not have to do with Pacheco´s ´´scope of employment´´ as the act happened outside the boundaries of the church and not within his working hours. However, if the plaintiff were to argue that in fact this conduct happened within the scope of employment, she would have to explain and convince that Pacheco was indeed responsible as it is a Pastor's duty and responsibility to guide and counsel at all hours, and not just limited to his church´s hours. A pastor is a figure of responsibility as a visible head for a community, not to mention that in some churches, a pastor is also a legal representative.
Employers should be held liable for the acts of their employees whenever there is a failure to supervise employees or some kind of misdemeanor is perpetrated within the employer´s work facilities or influential premises. These points of view however, are not stated by a lawyer/judicially, these are my personal observations after having researched on the case.
If you assume that Marcus must have been in a good mood because he helped Juanita pick up some books she dropped, according to attribution theory, his attribution is internal and unstable.
An internal attribution occurs when someone assigns some personal reason to justify an external event, rather than regarding the event as an environmental attribution.
- Like for example the belief that Marcus was in a good mood because of an external event.
The attribution is also unstable in that it assumes that a behavior is due to a temporary and unstable factor, meaning Marcus' good mood can change over time.
Therefore, the attribution given to Marcus is internal and unstable.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/15838795
