Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
Answer:
A.admissible as habit evidence
Explanation:
A passenger of Dan sustained injuries and filed a lawsuit against him. The passenger( plaintiff) presented someone to testify about how Dan has a bad reputation for reckless driving in the community.
This testimony by White would most likely be admissible in the court of law because Dan already has a bad reputation of the action he’s been charged with in his community.This makes it admissible as habit evidence.
The correct answer is letter D
A production process is a system of actions that are dynamically interrelated and that are oriented towards the transformation of certain elements.
Answer:
to help poor black people with homes and to make sure that all black people are safe
Explanation:
Answer:
i believe these are correct
Explanation:
sanctions -> punishments that enforce law, usually by taking something away
unilateral -> working alone to enact a policy
negotiate -> to workout a compromise or an agreement through discussions
diplomacy -> the work of maintaining relationships between different nations
multilateral -> taking an action cooperatively to enact
