A journal written by an employee at a factory provides the most credible information about the daily life of factory workers during the 1880's.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Journal from the factory's employees certainly reveals all their risks and activities in daily life with the right information. Of course, they deliver all the details from their experience. It also gets more value.
The letter collected by a farmer is totally irrelevant to the factory workers. The opposed union’s pamphlets may be presented with incorrect thoughts. Novel to motivate Factory regulation possess certain limitations and might be filled with imaginary ideas.
The correct answer is disregard; not confess
Social psychology is a sub-area of psychology, to which it presents several definitions, approaches and objects of study. Other authors believe that it is the intersection between psychology and sociology, since the social psychologist aims to help the individual, however considering his social environment, in a macro conception. It does not aim at individual change, but at collective. Regardless of the approach that the psychologist chooses to use, there are psychoanalysts or behaviorists who work in this area.
Social psychology is, in my understanding, the science of between. This means that the privileged place of psychosocial inquiry is neither the individual nor society, but precisely that nebulous and hybrid zone that comprises the relations between the two
B: asteroids.
In the early days of the Solar System, the gravitational influence of Jupiter caused the formation of the Asteroid Belt: in this region of the Solar System, there was enough material to form planets, but then Jupiter's gravity increased the velocity of this potentially new planets, so instead of accrete they collide into each other, forming the asteroids we can observe today.
Ah, the scientific method. Well. Here it is:
1. Ask a question.
Be specific! Define your variables. Tara might like to ask something like “What are the effects of text-messaging rather than talking on the quality of friendships?” But she needs to define what counts as high quality and low quality friendship. Besides, what effects does she mean?
2. Make a hypothesis.
Something like “I believe the more text-messaging involved rather than taking, the lower quality the friendship will be.” Again, she should define her variables better. Make sure to use an independent and dependant variable.
3. Collect data.
Find a way to collect data. Surveys? Interviews? In-field observation? Keep it objective and informative. Remember the Hawthorne effect- don’t get to close to participants if it’s a study.
4. Represent your data.
Some people like using graphs or charts or some sort. Find a simple way to represent the data so it is easily understood.
5. Analyze and conclude
What conclusions can she draw from her research and data? Did it prove her hypothesis correct? If so, how? What else can she say about what she noticed?
There can be more or less official steps depending on your point of view. Some people like to include material lists, or theories, or sources of error. Do what you wish, but the scientific method cannot be used without first asking a question.
