Explanation:
A focus group can be defined as a qualitative marketing research method where some people with common characteristics are brought together in a group who are guided by a trainer to promote discussions on a particular topic of interest and gather information to assist in decision making.
To organize focus groups for an innovative German-style fast food restaurant, you could separate 3 groups, the first being ages 18 to 30, the second 30-45 and the third group 45 and above.
The screening criteria could be, sources of income, profession, sex, taste for food, hobbies, etc.
The questions to ask could be related to the number of times a week people eat fast food, what is your favorite German food, how much are you willing to pay for the options offered in the restaurant, what elements do you consider most attractive in a restaurant ,etc.
The research design evidently has a problem with <u>"validity".</u>
Validity refers to how well a logical test or bit of research really allots what it sets to, or how well it mirrors the truth it professes to speak to. Like reliability, validity in this sense is an idea drawn from the positivist logical convention and necessities particular understanding and utilization with regards to qualitative research.
Me and my sister are in high school, and need tutoring in geometry and algebra 2, could she help?
Answer:
Explanation:
This question comes with these answer choices:
<h2>Solution</h2>
Saying sorry is not enough in most cases. The apology should include efforts to remedy or reduce the harm caused. Some kind of compensation.
Bill should find out what consequences his action had on Sally, and thus try to compensate in a way that the negative consequences are eliminated or minimized: is it necessary to replace something?, is it necessary to pay for monetary loss?, are feelings hurt, so that you need to change your behavior to remediate the situation?
Start by establishing the consequences of your action on the offended person and then implement a remedy.
Answer:
EV of node 4 = 0.6×5 + 0.4×0 = 3
EV of node 5 = 0.1×5 + 0.9×0 = 0.5
EV of node 2 = (0.8×5 + 0.2×EV of node 4) - 3
EV of node 2 = (0.8×5 + 0.2×3 ) - 3
EV of node 2 = 4.6 - 3
EV of node 2 = 1.6
EV of node 3 = (0.5×5 + 0.5×EV of node 5) - 1
EV of node 3 = (0.5×5 + 0.5×0.5 ) - 1
EV of node 3 = 2.75 - 1
EV of node 3 = 1.75
EV of node 3 is higher, therefore, best attend pattern is to attend randomly.
