If the results of a experiment do not support the hypothesis this does not necessarily mean that the experiment was a failure or that the hypothesis was wrong, but simply that the test that was conducted did not find results that were significant and also showed that the "null hypothesis" was incorrect. Therefore, if a hypothesis is shown to be inaccurate by a particular experiment the issue might need further experimentation because it could be wrong or it could not, but this does not mean the experiment was a failure. In fact proving a hypothesis can be informative for conducting further experiments to conclude what caused the phenomena if not the original hypothesis.
Answer: They wore animal hides and furs.
Explanation: Before farming was invented, people didn’t have the ability to have a stable home and life, so they were primarily nomads, moving from place to place along with the animals the hunted and consumed, so they most likely wore the pelts and skins they collected from the hunted animals.
Answer:
feel more effective.
Explanation:
In general sense, small groups are defined as group of people mostly three or a few more people, but not in large numbers (above twenty) who are together to achieve a common goal. For example, a group of talented guys, that forms a musical group for the purpose of realizing their musical or artistical dreams.
Some of the characteristics of small groups includes:
1. Shared identity
2. Results oriented approach
3. Interdependece
4. Competent team members
Hence, in comparison with the large groups, people in small groups tend to identify themselves with the core structures and goals of the group, there by less likely to take more than their equal share of available resources, which in turn makes them to FEEL MORE EFFECTIVE in general towards the success of the group.
Answer:
who the f cares !!!!!!!!!!
Explanation:
The answer would be finding a job. You have to be seeking for a job in order to get unemployment
