1 proposed by the council
Answer:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation:
it wont let me type the real answer
Miranda v. Arizona is the U.S. Supreme Court case that condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommunicado, or making promises that can't be kept.
The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court ruling (1966) ruled that arrested persons have rights to self-discrimination and lawyers under the fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution.
The Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects must be informed of their constitutional rights against defense counsel and self-incrimination before cross-examinating police.
the majority opinion by Earl Warren. Article 5 of the Constitutional Amendment requires law enforcement authorities to advise suspects on their right to remain silent during police detention interrogations and to consult lawyers.
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona here: brainly.com/question/1307890
#SPJ4
Answer:
Corruption can be defined as abuse of administrative authority or entrusted power to achieve personal benefits. Often, regulations and administration should be circumvented by corruption. Corruption is a topic in every country, even in the most developed ones.
Explanation:
KABOOOM
Hope this helps
The answer to this statement whether if it is true or false is that, it is false. It is because self-regulated people can create an environment that produces trust and fairness but because self-regulated people tend to be more controlling to their behavior and emotions, it does not necessarily that they can only produce fairness. While political behavior can be reduced based on some instances but it does not necessarily impact of the behavior and infighting to be reduced within the instance though productivity is high.
