Answer:
Power and time
Explanation:
Given the power of an appliance, the energy transferred is given as the product of power and time. Normally, power is defined as the rate of energy transfer per unit time in a circuit and expressed as
P=E/t
Making E the subject of the formula then
E=Pt
Where P is power, E is energy transfer and t is time.
Clearly, energy transfer is determined by power of an appliance and time.
Explanation:
Amount of heat supplied (Q) = 24500 J
Mass (m) = 2 kg
Initial temperature (t1) = 20 ° C
Final temperature (t2) = 35 ° C
Difference in temperature (dt) = t2 - t1 = ( 35 - 20) °C = 15 ° C
Now Specific heat capacity (S) = ?
We know we have the formula;
Q = m * s * dt
24500 = 2 * s * 15
24500 = 30 S
S = 24500 / 30
S = 816.67 J / Kg ° C
The specific heat capacity is 816.67 J/kg°C.
Hope it will help :)
Answer:
223.2
Explanation:
126.3851 + 7.2 + 73.607 + 15.98 = 223.1721
When adding/subtracting, round to the fewest decimal places. 7.2 has 1 number after the decimal point, so we'll round our answer to 223.2.
Answer:
The height of the water above the hole in the tank is 58 mm
Explanation:
In order to solve this problem we need to draw a sketch of the dimensions that include the input variables of the problem.
Where:
x = 0.579[m]
y = 1.45 [m]
Using the following kinematic equation we can find the time that takes the water to hit the ground, and then with this time, we can find the velocity of the water in the x-component.
It is necessary to clarify the value of each of the respective variables below
y = - 1.45 [m] "It is negative because this point is below the water outlet"
yo = 0
vo = 0 "The velocity is zero because the component of the speed on the Y-axis does not exist"
therefore:
The next step is to determine the velocity in component x, knowing the time.
Now using torricelli's law we can find the elevation.
The IRB at the university will decide whether her study meets ethical guidelines before it is initiated. The importance of these codes of conduct is to safeguard research participants, the status of psychology and the researchers or psychologists themselves. Moral issues hardly yield a simple, unequivocal, right or wrong answer. It is consequently often a matter of judgment whether the research is justified or not. For instance, it might be that a study roots psychological or physical uneasiness to participants, maybe they agonize pain or maybe even come to solemn harm.