What are four modes of writing that a historian uses

History

2 answers:

Anuta_ua [19.1K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Narration, Exposition, Description, and Argument.

Explanation:

Historian uses four-way to write his research paper or thesis. The purpose of his writing is to explain the past. Narration helps in finding stories and tales of history. Expositions explain the motive of ideas and causes of events which have caused in past. Descriptions guides historian in representing people and places of the particular place. At last argument, historians always try to take a position on a debatable subject by giving his ideas and thought of that particular topic.

LuckyWell [14K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

investigation,interviewed,collaboration and writing

You might be interested in

A false prophetess named Jezebel was teaching at Thyatira. True False

svp [43]

Answer:

A false prophetess named Jezebel was teaching in one of the churches in Revelation. FALSE. A false prophetess named Jezebel was teaching in one of the churches in Thyatira.

Explanation:

hmu if you need more help

6 0

3 years ago

The DEMOCRACY type of

leonid [27]

The answer is D government

8 0

3 years ago

When a candidate is elected by voters state wide , he or she is a ________ candidate

Kipish [7]

When a candidate is able to be elected by voters from a state, they would be the <u>primary candidate. </u>

<h3>Who is the primary candidate?</h3>

This is a person who wins the presidential primaries held by a party in a state.

In order to win, they would have to be voted by the majority of the party's members in the state.

Find out more on presidential primaries at brainly.com/question/680176.

#SPJ1

5 0

1 year ago

How did the long telegram shape american policy in dealing with the soviets?

cestrela7 [59]

A long telegram was sent by George Kennan to the Department of State. In the telegram, he detailed his views on the Soviet Union and the US policy toward the communist state. He started it off by stating that the Soviet could not foresee a "permanent peaceful coexistence" with the West.

3 0

3 years ago

How did religious division intensify the Ottoman-Safavid state rivalry?

ziro4ka [17]

<span>Religious beliefs have highly influenced the political and hierarchical structures in both Ottoman and Safavid Persia empires. Although both states were of Islamic religion, they belonged to different branches, Sunni and Shia. These branches differ over the choice of Muhammad's successor, which subsequently acquired broader political significance, as well as theological and juridical dimensions. Sunni Muslims believed that Muhammad didn’t clearly appoint a successor, which is why there isn’t hereditary succession law in Ottoman Empire. This contrasts with the Shia Muslims view, which holds that Muhammad appointed his son-in-law and cousin Ali ibn Abi Talib to succeed him. They believed that the empire should be led by direct successor of Muhammad’s line. Differences between these two branches affected the politics, as Shia Muslims weren’t religiously tolerant to other confessions and considered them for heretics, even the other branches of Islam. This resulted in the besieged of Bagdad, which was followed by the massacre of a large part of its Sunni Muslim inhabitants, as it was endeavored to transform Baghdad into a purely Shiite city. The besiege of Bagdad was the event that led to the Ottoman-Safavid war (1623–1639).</span>

7 0

3 years ago