Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
I believe it's the 3rd one
In this case we use intersecting secant theorem
According to this theorem, GF*GE = GH*GA
So,we plug in the values
(x-3)*(x-3+9) =(x-2)*(x-2+6)
(x-3)*(x+6) =(x-2)*(x+4)
x^2 +6x -3x -18 =x^2 +4x -2x -8
x^2 +3x -18 =x^2 +2x -8
x^2 +3x -18 -x^2 -2x +8 =0
x -10 =0
x=10
So,FG =x-3 = 10-3 =7
Answer and Step-by-step explanation: The null and alternative hypothesis for this test are:
To test it, use F-test statistics and compare variances of each treatment.
Calculate F-value:
F = 1.8356
The <u>critical value of F</u> is given by a F-distribution table with:
degree of freedom (row): 20 - 1 = 19
degree of freedom (column): 20 - 1 = 19
And a significance level: α = 0.05
= 2.2341
Comparing both values of F:
1.856 < 2.2341
i.e. F-value calculated is less than F-value of the table.
Therefore, failed to reject 
, meaning there is <u>no sufficient data to support the claim</u> that sham treatment have pain reductions which vary more than for those using magnets treatment.
Answer:
The Answer is B
Step-by-step explanation:
+7 at the end means up 7
The - 4 in the middle represents right 4
These are found using basic rules of translating equations
