4 years ago

Why would a statistician consider an inference incomplete without an accompanying measure of its reliability?

1 answer:

8 0

Answer:

An inference without a measure of reliability is nothing but a guess. The measure of reliability separates the science of statistics from the art of story telling. It gives a statistician a level of confidence that an inference made can to a reasonable extent be trusted

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Please help i will give extra points

castortr0y [4]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

3 x 4 ÷ 6 + 3²

multiply 3 and 4 to get 12

$\frac{12}{6}$ +3²

divide 12 by 6 to get 2

2+3²

find 3 to the power of 2 to get 9

2+9

Add 2 and 9 to get 11

hope this helps!

4 0

3 years ago

The perimeter of a rectangular field is 358 yards. If the length of the field is 95 yards, what is it’s width?

Andrej [43]

Answer:

84 yards (don't forget to label, as my friend failed a test because of it!)

Hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

The total perimeter of the field is 358

The are length and widths...

the length is 95

but since there are two lengths...

its 95*2 which is 190

358-190=168

Since there are two widths...

168/2= 84

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Use the lcd to determine which fraction is greater<br><br> 13/18,16/21

Gnom [1K]

16/21 is greater than 13/18.

5 0

4 years ago

Given<br> f(x) = 3x^2+ 2x – 1 and g(x) =4x- 5find (gof)(-2)

VashaNatasha [74]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

yeah-ya......... right?

7 0

3 years ago

Help please answer the picture

cupoosta [38]

Answer:

Three angles measuring 75, 45, and 60.

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Why would a statistician consider an inference incomplete without an accompanying measure of its​ reliability?

Why would a statistician consider an inference incomplete without an accompanying measure of its reliability?