Well, whoever made this question forgot to add in one of the answers, which is the correct one. IT WOULD BE D. Wicked
Answer:
Within minutes, the matter and food that fuels the protagonists are both helpers that made a difference in the world with their thinking skills. The groups also took their own free time to help people heat up their homes and donate phones. The difference between the two hero groups is that one group worked to heat up homes with leftover oil. The other group also worked very hard to donate over 180 million minutes to soldiers!
Explanation:
I improved the paragraph by adding commas where much needed pauses are needed, as well as adding adverbs.
Much of the paragraph is missing important pauses, causing it to feel rushed. In other words, it's important that your readers wouldn't be running out of breath reading your story. I also just changed phrase that seemed to stick out a bit.
I changed "activity time", being changed to just "free time", as "free time is far more commonly used to describe one's own time for their own activities.
I also changed "in" to "within" as it is generally best in novels to have more, long or intricate words in novels. It makes papers seem more professional.
Finally, I fixed some spelling errors like a missing space after "Phones.", and changing the "2" to a "two" as any number under ten should always be spelled out (if the number is 10 or over then it's optional).
Answer:
<em>The colonists have no other choice but to prepare for war if they want freedom.</em>
Explanation:
Patrick Henry was an attorney, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, and governor of Virginia.
Patriots, whom he represented, were the ones who were for independence from British influence. On the other side were Loyalists who supported the rule of the British government.
In this speech, he states that they tried every peaceful way in order to stop British autocracy, but with no success. So, now the only way to gain freedom is to fight for it.
Answer:
Argumentative writing → An essay argues that light on the field would add to the quality of life in the community.
Claim → The soccer field would get more use because the lights would allow night games.
Counterclaim → Some people think it is not worth the expense
Evidence → According to a poll, more than one third of the citizens approve the cost of adding lights to the soccer field
Reasoning → Our town should place lights near the soccer fields so teams can play at night.
Explanation:
I have been able to place each sentence to the correct term.
An essay that argues on a subject is usually classified to be argumentative writing. The statement claimed that "<em>The soccer field would get more use because the lights would allow night games</em>". This is actually a claim. But an opposition to the claim is known as counterclaim. So, when "<em>Some people think it is not worth the expense</em>", then it is counterclaim.
Then an evidence was given which we see from the poll that was carried out. Evidence usually comes with facts and data which is what the poll provided.
The speaker actually reasoned or thought that their "<em>...town should place lights near the soccer fields so teams can play at night</em>". This is reasoning.
Answer:
Kelvin ate six balls of kenkey at dinner
Explanation:
