Your classmate's error about AB and DC being complimentary and parallel is that they misapplied the alternate angle property.
<h3>Why are AB and DC not parallel?</h3><h3 />
There isn't enough evidence presented in the diagram to say that AB and DC are parallel.
The evidence required would be proof that angle AWZ is equal to angle WZY.
Instead, all we have is that angle AWZ and angle XYC are equal which does not tell us what we need to know about AB and DC being parallel.
Find out more on properties of parallel lines at brainly.com/question/24607467
#SPJ1
Answer:
A) 10
Step-by-step explanation:
In the US, a number in scientific notation will have a mantissa (a) such that ...
1 ≤ a < 10
That is, the value of "a" must be between 1 and 10 (not including 10).
_____
<em>Comment on alternatives</em>
In other places or in particular applications (some computer programming languages), the standard form of the number may be a×10^n with ...
0.1 ≤ a < 1
In engineering use, the form of the number is often chosen so that "n" is a multiple of 3, and "a" is in the range ...
1 ≤ a < 1000
This makes it easier to identify and use the appropriate standard SI prefix: nano-, micro-, milli-, kilo-, mega-, giga-, and so on.
Answer:
x = 3 should be the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
y is not graphed so y isn't part of the equation while x is so its X = K (K being the number that it goes up on) same thing applies to y if its horizontal then the equation is Y = K)
To find the perimeter, you add up all the sides.
11 + 5 + 13 = 29
29 inches is the perimeter.
