A social scientist is interested in determining if there is a significant difference in the proportion of Republicans between tw
o areas of town. He takes independent random samples of 20 families in each area of town and a significance test was conducted. The p-value was 0.106. What should be our conclusions?
A. The evidence is very strong - there is a difference in proportion of Republicans between the two areas of town.
B. The evidence is very strong - there is NO difference in the proportion of Republicans between the two areas of town.
C. We do not have enough statistical evidence to say that there is a significant difference in the proportion of Republicans between two areas of town.
B. The evidence is very strong - there is NO difference in the proportion of Republicans between the two areas of town.
Step-by-step explanation: Generally, a p-value of less than 0.05 is described as a strong evidence in favour of the null hypothesis. A p-value also known as the probability value is also known to provide the smallest level of evidence at which the null hypothesis would be rejected.
In the question, The p-value is 0.105 which is bigger in value than 0.05 which means there is no significant difference between the evidence and the null hypothesis.
Width is 26 cm. Length is 36 cm. The problem states that the length is 10 cm longer than the width. Since width is 26 I just added 10 to arrive at 36 cm.
36 / 9 = 4 cm.
The width will still be 26 but the length is now 4 cm.
Distance formula!!!!! yay i've done this umpth manytimes today for people so if you dont know distance formula is square root of (x1-x2)^2+ (y1+y2)^2. 0-(-7) -1-(-2) 7^2 + 1^2 49+1 sqr. root of 50 appx. 7.07 or the closest to it