Answer:
Dan is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
First, I calculated the amount of hours that the graph shows in total, coming up with a total of 3,085 hours. I do this by multiplying the number of adults surveyed by the number of hours they spent. So for the first column, (80+70)*1, second column, (90+80)*2, third column, (135+130)*3, fourth column, (140+135)*4, and fifth column, (65+75)*5 if you get what I mean. Then I add up all values. Knowing that there were two sets of 500 American adults interviewed already, I came to the conclusion that 1,000 total adults were surveyed. Finally, I divided the total number of hours(3,085) by the total number of adults interviewed (1,000) to get a mean of 3.085 hours, rounding it to 3 hours and proving that Dan is correct.
Answer:
denominator
Step-by-step explanation:
the upper part is numerator
so the lower is denominator
If you can separate the figures and the segment, or angle in question, is the same, the reflexive property of congruence can be used in the proof. ... Separating the two triangles, you can see Angle Z is the same angle for each triangle. Since they are the same angle, the angle is congruent to itself.
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
The Least common multiple (LCM) shows when the two over lap first.
The answer is 31 because the ones that have two colleges is 27 and the ones that have three colleges or more is 23. And if there is 170students you would add the 23+27=53 and divide that by 170.
53/170=31
