The statement is false.
Void and voidable contracts are one and the same. Exculpatory clauses are typically considered void towards public coverage. Covenants not to compete are commonly taken into consideration void as against public coverage.
A bilateral contract is a contract in which each party alternate guarantees to carry out. One birthday party's promise serves as consideration for the promise of the other. As a result, each party is an obligor of that birthday celebration's own promise and an obligee of the opposite's promise.
A contract wherein the events trade a promise for a promise is referred to as a Bilateral contract, whereas a contract wherein one birthday party gives a promise and the other birthday celebration performs an act is known as a Unilateral settlement. these legally enforceable promises can be in writing or oral.
Learn more about the bilateral contract here brainly.com/question/13741271
#SPJ4
The answer is Clean Water Act. It is a U.S. federal law that
controls the discharge of pollutants into the nation's surface waters. This act
was initially known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Also, this act
is managed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which arranges
water quality standards, handles implementation, and helps state and local
governments advance their own pollution control plans. The federal government delivered
billions of dollars in grants to back the building of sewage treatment
facilities around the country. This act also necessitate businesses to apply
for federal documents to discharge pollutants into water courses, as well as to
decrease the amount of their discharges over time.
(12-6)/12 gives you the growth rate *over five years* (115%)
divide that by 5 and you get an average rate of 23% growth per year.
If we’re rounding, yes, that statement is correct. Otherwise, growth over five years doubled because there was a growth of 115% and year-over-year growth was 23%.
If a group of students are measuring the number of paper bags brought to a recycling center in a single day, they are collecting data.
Stating a hypothesis is making an educated guess as to how many bags would be brought to the recycling center each day.
Drawing a conclusion would be when all of the data has been collected and examined.
Analyzing data would be going back to look at the collected data from the research project to see if the hypothesis was correct, what determinations were made and if any discoveries were made.
Answer:
Explanation:
Let's first determine the free cash flow of the firm
Particulars Years
1 2 3
EBIT 540 680 750
<u>Tax at 36% (0.36*540) (0.36*680) (0.36*750) </u>
Less: 345.6 435.2 480
Net Capital -
Spending 150 170 190
<u>Change in NWC 70 75 80 </u>
Less: 125.6 190.2 210
The terminal value at the end of T =(3 years) is:



= 2011.26
Finally, the value of the firm can be computed as follows:
Years Free Cash Flow PVIF PV
1 125.6 0.6589 107.88
2 190.2 0.7377 140.31
3 210 0.6336 133.06
<u>Terminal Value 2011.26 0.6336 1294.33 </u>
<u>Value of the firm ⇒ $1655.58</u>