<h3>What is the "first consideration" for policymakers?</h3>
<em>Answer</em><em>;</em><em> </em>
<h3>Lavis JN, Gilbert R, Salanti G, Harden M, See S. Infant sleeping position and the sudden infant death syndrome: systematic review of observational studies and historical review of recommendations from 1940 to 2002. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:874–87. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi08</h3>
<h3><em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it's</em><em> </em><em>helpful</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>you</em></h3>
Two examples of real-life instances where a person might engage in an error in reasoning and, as a result, come to a faulty conclusion about something that they observed are:
1. Concluding that a person is harsh because his face is not cheerful.
2. Predicting that it will rain because the weather is gloomy.
<h3>What is a Faulty Conclusion?</h3>
A faulty conclusion is reached when the pattern of reasoning is faulty. Before a conclusion can be reached on a matter, it is vital to test the observations beyond all reasonable doubts.
If this is not done, the probability of reaching a faulty conclusion will be high.
Learn more about faulty conclusions here:
brainly.com/question/2141635
Statutes that impose mandatory prison sentences, on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses are called three-strikes law.
<h3>What is
three-strikes law?</h3>
Three-strikes law, serves as the criminal sentencing structure which is been imposed on anyone found guilty for the third violation of violent felonies.
Therefore, Statutes that impose mandatory prison sentences, on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses are called three-strikes law.
Learn more about Three-strikes law at
brainly.com/question/13881309
#SPJ1
The answer would be (B. 10th Amendment.)
