Step-by-step explanation:
![\frac{1}{8} \div \frac{1}{3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B8%7D%20%20%5Cdiv%20%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%20)
![\frac{1}{8} \times 3](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B8%7D%20%20%5Ctimes%203)
![\frac{3}{8}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B8%7D%20)
Alternate form
0.375
Answer:
Linear function is specified by the equation ⇒ answer B
Step-by-step explanation:
* Look to the attached file
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
Total money = $30,00,000
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
4/5 money spend on house
3/4 remaining money spend on luxury yacht
2/3 remaining money spend on trip to space
Remaining $50,000 to charity
Find:
Total money
Computation:
Assume Total money = x
So,
Spend on house = [4x/5]
Spend on luxury yacht = [x-4x/5]3/4 = 3x/20
Spend on trip to space = [x/5-3x/20]2/3 = x/30
Remaining money = x/20 - x/30 = x/60 = $50,000
So,
x/60 = $50,000
x = $300,000
Total money = $30,00,000
Answer:
1.2x-1.2y
Step-by-step explanation: