Answer:
e. argued in favor of the gold standard.
Explanation:
A gold standard is an economic system that equate gold' weight to a certain amount of currency. When it first enacted in united states, One Troy ounce of gold can be converted to $20.67.
McKinley use his support for the gold standard as his main platform during his presidential election. He argued that including other metal beside gold (such as silver) as a monetary standard can create a volatility in the value of the dollar.
The correct answer should be <span>the North seemed unlikely to win the war
The battle of Chancellorsville was a clear victory for the Confederate forces and the Union had to retreat having completely lost, even though there were heavy casualties on both sides.</span>
The mixture of Buddhism and Confucism that go in every asian community. The process of sharing myths of how the rituals and practices were created.
Farmer joe only breeds the largest hogs, the fastest horses, or the cows that give the most milk. this is an example of artificial selection.
The process by which humans select individual organisms with specific phenotypic trait values for breeding is known as artificial selection. If the selected trait has additive genetic variance, it will respond to selection, i.e., the trait will evolve. All of our domesticated species, including crop plants, livestock, and pets, are the result of selective breeding for desirable traits such as hardy seeds and fruits, increased meat and milk production, and docile behavior.
Although the earliest artificial selection was unintentional, it evolved into a sophisticated science of plant and animal breeding; indeed, much of the field of quantitative genetics was developed to improve breeding programs.
Learn more about artificial selection here:
brainly.com/question/12560443
#SPJ4
Answer:
B.mental health professionals could not reliably assess whether mental illness caused criminal behavior
Explanation:
Judge David Bazelon was who proposed to do a scientific exam about mental illness in the criminal area. In the end, his ruling established that the defendant was not responsible for his criminal act if he was suffering from being mentally unstable. However, there is no verifiable certainty that the defendant, because of his illness, committed the crimes.
