Answer:
The subject and predicate (verb) are missing, including a conjunction between "kindest" and "most."
Explanation:
When the subject, a verb, and a conjunction are added to the phrase "the kindest most generous person in the world," it will then become a sentence. In its present form, it remains a phrase, that is, a group of words without meaning. For example, we can correctly rephrase the above into a sentence as: "John remains the kindest and most generous person in the world."
The one that cannot be used to interpret their feeling are: The words they use
Most people will interpret communication 7% from the verbal language and 93% from the non-verbal cue.
To fully interpret one's feeling, it is important to pay attention to their non-verbal cues such as intonation, their expression, the volume of their voice, and their gesture
<u>Local and tribal government</u> has direct responsibility for the safety of its residents and direct knowledge of the situation and accompanying resource requirements.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Local government is a form of administration of public in particular town, state and country. The local government is responsible for recreation and amenity services, development of economy and maintaining the register of electors.
Tribal government is an independent government that operates apart from the state or federal governments. Tribal government is the most important part of the American government. They are responsible for imposing taxes and creating court systems. Road and public work facilities were also maintained by the tribal government.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
