Let the first investment be x
and second be 3000-x
so 3%of x + 4% of (3000-x) = 107
By solving x = 1300
First investment is 1300
second investment is 1700
[|] Answer [|]

[|] Explanation [|]
Rewrite the equation with parts separated:
8 + 7/9 - 3 - 2/3
Solve the whole number parts:
8 - 3 = 5
Solve the fraction parts:
7/9 - 2/3
Find LCD of 7/9 & 2/3
7/9 - 6/9 = 1/9
5 + 1/9 = 5 1/9
![\boxed{[|] \ Eclipsed \ [|]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cboxed%7B%5B%7C%5D%20%5C%20Eclipsed%20%5C%20%5B%7C%5D%7D)
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Given

Required
Show on a number line

Divide through by -2


Add 1 to both sides


Divide through by 3

<em>See Attachment for number line</em>
The bag contains,
Red (R) marbles is 9, Green (G) marbles is 7 and Blue (B) marbles is 4,
Total marbles (possible outcome) is,

Let P(R) represent the probablity of picking a red marble,
P(G) represent the probability of picking a green marble and,
P(B) represent the probability of picking a blue marble.
Probability , P, is,


Probablity of drawing a Red marble (R) and then a blue marble (B) without being replaced,
That means once a marble is drawn, the total marbles (possible outcome) reduces as well,

Hence, the best option is G.
The expression (-4x + 9)^2 cannot be equal to (-4x)^2 + 9^2 because it is actually equal to the product of two factors (3 + 2sqrt x) (3- 2 sqrt x). One cannot use obviously distributive property. Hence the answer to this problem should be C. as she did not understand both perfect square trinomial and did not determine the product