B. To help determine how much inventory to keep in stock of each item in the outlet, I would consider two factors. The first one is the <u>certain amount of each item type </u>in the first week - determining the number of each items input in the stock to be the original data to compare. The second is the <u>number of items sold and still on stock</u>. This would help determine invetory to keep in stock.
B. If I was running a store, I would prefer to use the pick up at store buying method. There would be cashier at the register to check the products and bills as well as receive money from the customers. This is the traditional and still always the most common methods. As the fact that people nowadays still like shopping in physical store, this is definitely the most effective method.
C. The inventory control method I would use when operating a store is to adopt modern technology like bar code to control the inventory stock. By using this technology, I would need to consider the <u>bar code</u> for each type and establishing <u>software</u> to automatically input the information about the number of items sold and in stock. With inputting the number of total items at the beginning and giving each item its corresponding bar code, the sales or number of stock would be tracked by the software.
D. An example of two commodities to be displayed together at store is <u>pencil and rubber</u>. Pencil and rubber undoubtedly are complementary products of each other. Complementary products are made to be used together. Each item requires the other for their complete uses. This is also the case of Rubber and Pencil and each item would not be fully used without the presence of the other.
Answer: The rate of return on common stockholder’s equity is 23%.
Explanation:
Given that,
Net Income = $50,000
Preferred Dividends = 8,000
Average Common Stockholder’s Equity = 180,000
Average number of Common Shares Outstanding = 250,000 shares
Market Price = $2 per share
Therefore,
Return on equity = 
= 
= 23%
Answer:
fundamental attribution error.
Explanation:
This theory in sociology also called the attribution effect states that people tend to over-attribute behavior of others to internal causes or traits.
The Professor makes this "fundamental attribution error" by failing to consider Nadiya's situation; meaning the situational information was insufficiently taken into account before reaching a conclusion (Probably Nadiya is under emotional distresse maybe she's grieving the death of her Farther).
Answer:
$400,000
Explanation:
Since at December 31, Year 5, Tedd's tax advisor believed that an unfavorable outcome was <u>probable</u>. And a <u>reasonable estimate </u>of additional taxes was $400,000 but could be as much as $600,000.
Although after the Year 5 financial statements were issued, Tedd received and accepted an IRS settlement offer of $450,000.
Tedd should have included an amount of $400,000 as accrued liability in its December 31, Year 5 balance sheet
The reason is that according to the International Financial Reporting Standards, a PROVISION must be made as long as the conditions below were obtainable at year end.
- Existing Condition (which in this case is the tax dispute with the IRS)
- Probable Cash Outflow (which Tedd's Tax adviser confirmed)
- Reliable Estimate of Outflow ( which the scenario stated ''A reasonable estimate of additional taxes was $400,000'')
Hence, such 'reasonable estimate is the appropriate amount for inclusion in the financial statements.
The answer to that question is letter D. hope this helps
