To determine what the line looks like, simply change it to y = mx + b form. Then simply either make a table of values. And substitute any points into the equation and obtain points to plot on the graph. Or you can simply plot the graph by using the slope of the equation.
Y = 8 - 6x/2
Y = 4 - 3x
Y = -3x + 4.
This would be the rearranged equation.
Angle ADB= 40 degrees.
The triangle ADB is equal to 180 degrees. Subtract 180-105=75
Since vertical angles are always congruent angle ABD= 35 degrees.
So 75-35=40.
I hope this is what you’re looking for
Volume of a cone=
When you calculate it, you will get 167.55
Then you will round that to 168.
So, the answer is D. 168 cubic cm
Answer:
The answer is below
Step-by-step explanation:
Triangle FCD is cut from parallelogram ABCD moved with left-hand side. What are the dimensions of the resulting rectangle AEFD?
A parallelogram is a quadrilateral (has four sides and four angles) in which opposite sides are parallel to each other.
A rectangle is a quadrilateral with opposite sides which are parallel and equal to each other. All the angles in a rectangle are at 90 degrees.
From the image, AD = z, FC = x, BF = w and BC = y. Hence:
EB = FC = x.
EF = AD = length = z; AE = FD = height = w
Therefore the dimensions of rectangle AEFD is length z and height w
Complete Question
A manufacturer of nickel-hydrogen batteries randomly selects 100 nickel plates for test cells, cycles them a specified number of times, and determines that 11 of the plates have blistered. Does this provide compelling evidence for concluding that more than 10% of plates blister under such circumstances?
A) State H_0 and H_a, (5 pts)
B) Test the hypothesis using the P-Value approach at a significance level of 4%: (15 pts)
Expert Answer
Answer:
a)
b) We fail to reject Null hypothesis
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that:
Sample size n=100
No. with blistered x=11
a)
Generally the Hypothesis given as
b)
Since p=0.10
Therefore
Test statistics
From table
Therefore
P-value >0.04 significance level
Hence,We cannot conclude that at significance level the proportion is greater than
We fail to reject Null hypothesis