Is 1.88 rational or is it irrational

seropon [69]

So for question one (about the equilateral triangle), you know any triangle equals 180 degrees. So an equilateral triangle has all equal angles, so 180/3 would equal 60 degrees for each angle.

Now for the first triangle out of the three isosceles.

You should know that there are two equal sides and one side that is not equal in a isosceles triangle.

So if one side is 34 degrees, and the other two are equal, then you first subtract 34 degrees from 180 degrees, because again, all triangles have 180 degrees. So 180-34 would equal to 146 degrees left. Now you divide 146 by two, because the other two angles are equal to each other. So 146/2 = 73 degrees for each of the remaining angles.

For the second triangle out of the three isosceles.

First, let's just calculate half of the triangle first. You already know two angles, 30 and 90 degrees (hence the 90 degree symbol).

So 30 + 90 would equal 120 degrees in total out of 180 degrees (because 1 triangle = 180 degrees).

So if you subtract 180-120 or 120 + ? = 180 to know the remaining angle of the half of the triangle, you would get 60 degrees left. And that also goes with the other side of the top angle of the entire triangle, so your answer for the second one would be 60 degrees. :-)

For the third triangle out of the three isosceles.

You know one angle is 75 degrees.

If you turn your screen a little bit (like about 90 degrees) to the left, you would see that two sides (with the x degree in the middle) is equal. So then know you know the other side of the triangle would also be 75 degrees, because one side that is equal has 75 degrees.

Now you have two 75 degrees, you add 75 + 75, which gives you 150 degrees now.

So obviously again, 180 degrees is the total amount of degrees in a triangle, and you want to know the last degree that would make the triangle equal to 180 degrees out of 150 degrees, so 180-150 or 150 + ? = 180, which gives you 30 degrees for x for the third isosceles triangle.

try doing the fourth one by yourself lol

5 0

3 years ago

Find the volume of a pyramid with a square base, where the perimeter of the base is 7.3\text{ ft}7.3 ft and the height of the py

Cloud [144]

Answer:

$V=6.66\ ft^3$

Step-by-step explanation:

The perimeter of the square base of a pyramid = 7.3 ft

The height of the pyramid, h = 6ft

The perimeter of a square is given by :

P = 4s, s is the side of square

7.3 = 4s

s = 1.825 ft

The volume of a pyramid is given by :

$V=\dfrac{lbh}{3}$

Here, l = b = 1.825 ft

So,

$V=\dfrac{1.825\times 1.825\times 6}{3}\\\\V=6.66\ ft^3$

So, the volume of the pyramid is equal to $6.66\ ft^3$ .

3 0

3 years ago

Don't understand PLZ help

lesya692 [45]

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

A is the answer because the slope is 1 square which you can see from the line and also the y-intercept is 2 which means it is 2 on the y axis. Also please can I get brainly :)

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

McKenzie's goal is to score 15 baskets; she scored 11 so far. Write and solve an

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer:

b+11=15

15-11

b=4

Step-by-step explanation:

b stands for the number of baskets and she has already made 11 baskets so just a quick equation would be this.

4 0

3 years ago

????????????????????????????

katrin2010 [14]

Answer: See below.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's go number by number.

Rational pretty much means you can put it into a fraction of whole numbers.

The first number is -81,572.

This number is rational because it can be put into a fraction ( $\frac{-81572}{1}$ ) that is made up of whole numbers.

The second number is $\sqrt{11}$ .

This number is irrational because it cannot be put into a fraction of whole numbers.
Keep in mind that most squareroots are irrational. Especially those that don't equal a whole number.

The third number is 5.636336333

There is a pattern so the number is rational.
Usually a pattrn means it can be put into a fraction.

The fourth number is $\sqrt{16}$ . This equals 4 if you solve it out.

Since we just get 4, that certainly can be put into a fraction of whole numbers, so this is rational.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers