Answer:
Yes and yes
Explanation:
To both questions I think that I would hear the case and do something about it and I would definitely order the accused to be sent back to United States because people during Reconstruction deserves to be heard and that serving on a court in Indian Territory might not be such a bad idea. I don't really want to just ignore the case entirely because what if some people want this case solve badly? Then that would not end well.
I hope this helped.
Hi there!
The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 was significant because it was the second continental congress that charted a government for territory in Northwest America. It also helped forbid slavery, and made a method of admitting new states near the Union.
I trust “<u>Source 1</u>”
<u>Explanation</u>:
I would trust the Source 1 i.e., the “Sworn testimony by American Sergeant in Congressional hearings in 1969” more because a sworn testimony is a gold evidence for the Congressional hearings. It won’t affect a person i.e., the Sergeant in any way. Maybe the testimony can get corrupted by lying, forcing and constraining, and the shaking the human memory. But in a speech by the General can affect his reputation as he can hid the truth and lie in his speech. So, the sworn testimony is more reliable than the speech.
Their initial intention was to meet for the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation, to add some strength to its authority without threatening the sovereignty of the states themselves.
Answer:
Options A., C., D., and F
Explanation:
United Nations are widely known as an international organization whose mission is to maintain and ensure there are peace and security, along with cooperation and civil relations among various nations.
Some of the UN responsibilities include the following:
1. provision of peacekeeping forces to areas of conflict.
2. Assist in settling legal disagreements between conflicting nations.
3. Assists with humanitarian relief in areas hit by natural disasters.
4. Ensure there are sanctions against countries that violate human rights