All categories

3 years ago

What mixture can be separated by using a filter?

Chemistry

1 answer:

nexus9112 [7]3 years ago

4 0

<h2>Answer: </h2>

Option 2nd - a mixture of solid particles in a liquid.

<h2>Explanation: </h2>

For a Mixture of two immiscible liquids (for example water and oil) it is not possible to filter them with a filter as both of the liquid will pass through it.
For a mixture of a solid and a liquid (for example sand and water) it can be easily separated through a filter as on filtration solid will be left on the filter and the liquid will pass through it.
For a mixture of two miscible liquids (for example milk and water) both of them will form a single identity, and on filtration both of them will pass through the filter. Hence it is not possible to separate them through filter.
For a mixture of liquid and gas (for example drinking soda or Pepsi) filter is not needed for their separation as it will be separated when exposed in air.

Result: Option 2 is the correct answer.

You might be interested in

Toluene (C6H5CH3 ), an organic compound often used as a solvent in paints, is mixed with a similar organic compound, benzene (C6

Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Explanation:

The given data is as follows.

Weight of solute = 75.8 g, Molecular weight of solute (toulene) = 92.13 g/mol, volume = 200 ml

Therefore, molarity of toulene is calculated as follows.

Molarity = $\frac{\text{weight of solute}}{\text{molecular weight of solute}} \times \frac{1000}{\text{volume of solution in ml}}$

= $\frac{75.8 g}{92.13 g/mol} \times \frac{1000}{200 ml}$

= 4.11 M

Hence, molarity of toulene is 4.11 M.

As molality is the number of moles of solute present in kg of solvent.

So, we will calculate the molality of toulene as follows.

Molality = $\frac{\text{given weight of solute}}{\text{given molecular weight of solute}} \times \frac{1000}{\text{weight of solvent in grams}}$

= $\frac{75.8 g}{92.13 g/mol} \times \frac{1000}{95.6 g}$

= 8.6 m

Hence, molality of given toulene solution is 8.6 m.

Now, calculate the number of moles of toulene as follows.

No. of moles = $\frac{mass}{\text{molar mass}}$

= $\frac{75.8 g}{92.13 g/mol}$

= 0.8227 mol

Now, no. of moles of benzene will be as follows.

No. of moles = $\frac{mass}{\text{molar mass}}$

= $\frac{95.6 g}{78.11 g/mol}$

= 1.2239 mol

Hence, the mole fraction of toulene is as follows.

Mole fraction = $\frac{\text{moles of toulene}}{\text{total moles}}$

= $\frac{0.8227 mol}{(0.8227 + 1.2239) mol}$

= 0.402

Hence, mole fraction of toulene is 0.402.

As density of given solution is 0.857 $g/cm^{3}$ so, we will calculate the mass of solution as follows.

Density = $\frac{mass}{volume}$

0.857 $g/cm^{3}$ = $\frac{mass}{200 ml}$ (As 1 $cm^{3}$ = 1 g)

mass = 171.4 g

Therefore, calculate the mass percent of toulene as follows.

Mass % = $\frac{\text{mass of solute}}{\text{mass of solution}} \times 100$

= $\frac{75.8 g}{171.4 g} \times 100$

= 44.22%

Therefore, mass percent of toulene is 44.22%.

8 0

3 years ago

Examples of gravitational potential energy.

Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

the top of the roller coaster

Explanation:

the roller coaster at the top when it has the most potential energy reaches Peak when its going to convert into kinetic energy

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which graph correctly shows the effect on the freezing point caused by increasing the molality of a solution ?

beks73 [17]

The answer to your question is graph A :)

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following best describes the electron cloud model? A. It shows that electrons usually carry a negative charge. B. I

irakobra [83]

<span>D. It shows that the electrons within an atom do not have sharp boundaries.</span>

8 0

3 years ago

The element copper has 29 protons. What is the atomic number of copper?

stiks02 [169]

The atomic number of copper is 29.

Hope this helps and if it does, don't be afraid to rate my answer as well as maybe give it a "Thanks"? (Or even better a "Brainliest"). And if it’s not correct, I am sorry for wasting your time, and good luck finding the correct answer :)

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers