Answer:
B. two strengths and one threat
Explanation:
SWOT is an acronym that stands for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
SWOT analysis helps an organization assess it's competitive position and devise strategies accordingly. Such an analysis aids an enterprise in decision making and planning.
In the given case, availability of finance/capital conveys strength and so does availability of skilled installers.
The construction activity being at an all time low with residential properties being foreclosed depicts a threat.
Thus, the given scenario represents two strengths and one threat.
Answer:
Testerman Construction Co.
Internal rate of return method in analyzing capital expenditure:
Present value of expenditure = $149,630
Present of cash inflows annuity = $149,630 (using 20% discount rate and present value annuity factor of 3.3251 x $45,000)
NPV = $0 (PV of cash outflow - PV of cash inflow)
Therefore, the IRR = 20%
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Investment cost = $149,630
Annual net cash flows = $45,000
Investment period = 6 years
Annuity of future cash flows = 3.3251
b) Testerman’s IRR (Internal Rate of Return) is a capital budgeting and analysis tool which determines the discount rate that makes the present value of future inflows equal to the present value of outflows from a project. This IRR helps the managers to determine the projects that add value and are worth undertaking. IRR is based on assumptions. Similar projects with the same IRR will differ in returns due to the differences in timing and the size of the cash, the amount of debts and equity used to generate the returns, and the assumption of a constant reinvestment may which IRR makes.
government i think correct me if im rwong l
Answer: buying stakes.
Explanation: a tame answer
Answer:
The reason the government is often more responsive to producer interests than to consumer interests when it comes to the imposition of tariffs and quotas is:
it wants to ensure that producers are protected from foreign competition.
Explanation:
Producers face foreign competitive threats. Consumers do not face such competition. Therefore, the government will often consider the producers' interests more than the consumers' interests when imposing trade tariffs and quotas. If local industries are not protected from their foreign competitors, the unemployment rate will increase and the economy will be flooded with cheap and low quality goods from other countries. In that way, the US will be subsidizing the foreign producers indirectly.