Answer: I want to say it is C because if it was a that she liked eating you would see something that hints to her being hungry but in this text it show nothing of that. so in conclusion the answer would be C.
Answer:
a picture would help me understand what its asking :)
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read:
A Mom Sues Nutella Maker For Deceptive Advertising
By Whitney Blair Wyckoff
Which statement is not Whitney Blair Wycoff's point of view about suing
Nutella in her article?
O A) Nutella is not a nutritional substitute.
B) We want to hold foodmakers accountable.
C) How could something that tastes so good be healthy?
O D) How could a mom mistake Nutella for health food?
Answer:
C) How could something that tastes so good be healthy?
Explanation:
Wyckoff´s remark about how something that tastes so good could be healthy is only a rhetorical question aimed to emphasize how ridiculous it was for her to believe that Nutella was a healthy snack, not her point of view on the topic.
She does claim that Nutella is not a nutritional substitute, and she does mention the objective of holding food makers accountable which can be understood as a kind of support for that idea. And she also questions Athena Hohenberg for mistaking Nutella for healthy food.
The central idea in the above passage is A) Angry dogs can be distracted by food.
Reading through the choices, Choice A is the most feasible choice for the passage.
Choice B. - Dogs regardless of size tend to get into fights especially when they feel threatened or territorial.
Choice C. - Dogs wag their tails whenever they are happy and excited.
Choice D. - Dogs usually get along well, there are just some instance when they feel as though they are threatened thus their instinct to fight to protect their territories.
