Answer:
True
Explanation:
In psychology, the term overconfidence phenomenon refers to the phenomenon that occurs when a person has more confidence in their abilities than their actual accuracy. In other words, the person is more confident about themselves than accurate.
In this example, you used to envy your brother because he was always so confident, but, as you grow older you become that your brother is more often convinced of things than accurate about those things. In other words, <u>he is more confident that accurate about himself. </u>Therefore, this is indeed an example of the overconfidence phenomenon.
This representation is called a: <u>Mental Map</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Mental map is a kind of cognitive map which helps an individual to recall the information about their location and landmark in their daily life. It is a combination of objective knowledge and subjective perceptions.
In the above scenario, Kate has a mental map as she is familiar with her hometown. This mental map helps her to navigate around the nearby places like rivers, parks, buildings and freeways.
The mental map can help the individual to organize the information and easily locate the places they want to visit. Mental map helps in increasing creativity and thinking level of the person.
Answer:
After the problem is properly identified Tyler must identify the decision criteria in this case Tyler identified the problem as a <u>general safety problem</u> (accidents during high-rise building) and possible solutions for this kind of issue will involve costs.
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
