I think some parts of Hammurabi's code were too severe. I believe this because sometimes it affected innocent people. Some occasions of this are when a man's son is killed because of the father building something faulty. Sometimes it is fair though such as when a man who is too lazy to fix his dam causes it to flood and he has to pay for the crops lost in the flood.
There are many, but the major ones are that
1) language is somehow saved in our genes, which means that people with better communication skills had a survival advantage over those that didn't and that language is innate. This usually means that the specific parts of language: syntax for example are innate too
2) language was "invented" like writing: and then it was transmitted and changed.
<u>Answer:</u> Letter "e" is correct. As seen below;
<u>Explanation: </u>
It´s role is to insight what, in a particular product or service, makes it so attractive to impulse and maintain its consume by some group. What shapes people <em>decision</em> toward product/service and makes their experience interesting to probably repeat usage/consume. That is the logics behind it: so companies may sell more and conquer preference.
It is about <em>consumer engagement and experience:</em> not about the product or the consumers alone; it is about this revealing interaction/friction the product/service produces on its proprietor/user.
Considering the intangibility of the matter, it is not appropriate to say that utility role in economic modeling provides "objective measure", nor shows "combinations of goods" or even "identifies consumers" like aims. These are not the primary intention, but eventual subproducts. Captivating people´s reasons of enjoyment is the focus and starting point.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) is the only global international organization dealing with the rules of trade between nations. At its heart are the WTO agreements, negotiated and signed by the bulk of the world's trading nations and ratified in their parliaments.
