1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
geniusboy [140]
3 years ago
9

According to freud, the _____ part of personality is responsible for morality.

Social Studies
1 answer:
devlian [24]3 years ago
3 0
Superego is our sense of right and wrong! (So therefore, our morality)
You might be interested in
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
India, Pakistan, and China are unlikely to risk a significant conflict over their competing claims in Kashmir because
Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

India, Pakistan, and China are unlikely to risk a significant conflict over their competing claims in Kashmir because the three nations are nuclear powers, with which an eventual military conflict in the region could imply a nuclear escalation that would significantly affect global stability. .

Indeed, China is one of the five countries authorized to possess nuclear weapons by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. For their part, both India and Pakistan are not party to the treaty, and have developed their own nuclear weapons.

Thus, China has about 200 active nuclear warheads, Pakistan about 90 and India about 70, that is, the three nations have the possibility of destroying each other if they wish so. And it is precisely this possibility that limits the escalation of conflicts in the region: the fear of being destroyed by the enemy makes the peace to last.

5 0
3 years ago
Sociologists argue that what is considered deviant varies from culture to culture. Give an example of something that might be co
Mkey [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

<u>One of the examples of behavior that would be considered deviant in one society and not in the other is the eating of certain animals. The examples are:</u>

  • Some societies in India consider the cow a sacred animal and never would consume beef.
  • Muslim societies do not eat pork meat.
  • Insects are considered a tasty snack in many countries, including Thailand, while it would be considered gross by many people from the west.
  • While some of the western European countries (like France and Belgium) have specialized butcher shops and restaurants for horse meat, eating it would most likely be considered taboo in the US or UK.
  • The most radical example is the eating of dogs, which occurs in some Asian countries, most notably China. There is even a whole festival for dog meat consumption in Yulin, and every year there are protests across the globe because of this event. Slaughtering dogs for meat consumption is prohibited in the US and plenty of other countries.

<u>With all of this, we can conclude that some food consumption can be seen as deviant in some parts of the world, while in others it is a normal occurrence and part of the every-day diet.</u>

Despite various taboos and laws, what we have to understand is that our connection to the animals is culturally constructed. The fact that people of the US feel closer to dogs, cats, and horses, but not to sheep and pigs, is not the fact supported by nature. There is nothing in nature itself and the nutrition of horses, insects, and various other species that prevents us to eat them. These deviances surrounding different meats are all culturally constructed. <u>This does not mean they are less real or that we should eat all the animals, just that we have to realize that our ways are no naturally more or less right than someone else’s.</u>

4 0
2 years ago
Which of the following would result in cognitive dissonance?
Molodets [167]

Answer:

a.

Explanation:

Based on the answers provided within the question it can be said that the statement that would result in cognitive dissonance would be "I believe smoking is bad for my health; I love to smoke.". That is because cognitive dissonance refers to to conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. Therefore by saying that smoking is bad for you but either way you love to smoke then you are contradicting yourself.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does fertile mean? Why would Sumerians settle on fertile land? The Fertile Crescent is a region. Why does it fit into that
balandron [24]
Hey there!

Fertile means very suitable for farming - in other words, very rich and full of nutrients plants and food need to grow. When you say soil is fertile, often that means it's capable of producing massive food surpluses due to the fact that it can grow so much.

It's a region because it has the two rivers, the Tigris and the Euphrates around it. Unlike other regions around the area, the soil was unnaturally fertile, and that's why it takes up it's own region because it's not the same anywhere else.

It's a physical region. Humans did not create it, and the soil is part of what makes it physical. The settlers used the soil, but didn't make it.

Hope this helps! 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which choice best explains why radios were a popular way to get the news?
    8·1 answer
  • Logistic population growth patterns are indicative of what
    12·1 answer
  • Chris believes that anyone who listens to pop music is an idiot. one day, chris realizes that the song he is dancing and singing
    8·1 answer
  • 1) The best definition for the word "civic responsibility" is
    10·1 answer
  • Why would speaking the same language cause people to form a closer<br> relationship? *
    8·2 answers
  • Country X can produce 1,000 units of food and 2,000 units of clothes. Country Y can produce 1,000 units of food and 1,000 units
    9·1 answer
  • What is naturalisation​
    6·1 answer
  • PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ HELPpppppppppppppppppppppp I BEGGING YOUTHIS DUE TODAY AND I NEED YOUR HELP PLZ DON'T TROLL!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • The activities related to the governance of a state or territory describes what key term?
    8·1 answer
  • Difference between intensive and subsistence farming​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!