1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Umnica [9.8K]
3 years ago
5

What reason did Taney give for why he believed Dred Scott was an enslaved person

History
2 answers:
Svetradugi [14.3K]3 years ago
4 0
Drett scott was considered property and the court can not take away property.
Alex3 years ago
4 0

The case of Dred Scott v. Sandford was a judicial claim, crucial in the history of the United States, resolved by the Supreme Court in 1857, in which it was decided to deprive any inhabitant of African descent, whether slaves or not, the right to citizenship; and the authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories of the country was removed from Congress. The decision was drafted by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney.

On March 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney issued the majority opinion. Taney ruled that:

-Anyone of African descent, whether slave or free, was not a citizen of the United States, according to the Constitution.

-The Ordinance of 1787 could not confer neither freedom nor citizenship within the Northwest Territory to non-white individuals.

-The provisions of the Missouri Compromise were annulled as a legislative act, since the act exceeded the powers of Congress, as it tried to exclude slavery and impart liberty and citizenship to non-white people in the north part of the Louisiana territory.

The court ruled that African-Americans had no right to freedom or citizenship. As they were not citizens, they did not have the legal capacity to file a lawsuit in federal court. Because slaves were private property, Congress did not have the power to regulate slavery in the territories and could not revoke the rights of a slave owner according to the place where he lived. This decision nullified the essence of the Missouri Compromise, which divided the territories into free or slave jurisdictions. Speaking on behalf of the majority, Taney ruled that because Scott simply considered himself the private property of his owners, he was subject to the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits taking ownership of his owner "without due process."

You might be interested in
Who is the 37 president of the US
12345 [234]

Answer:

Richard Nixon

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help out another kind lad
grandymaker [24]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

The Final Solution is the shortened version of what the Nazis called the Final Solution to the Jewish Question. It was the term for the Nazi plan for the extermination and Genocide of the Jewish people during World War II.The code name was for the murder of all Jews in reach but was not restricted to Europe once they had completed their aims within the continent. The program evolved during the first 2 years of the war leading to the Holocaust where the aim was to murder “every last Jew in the German grasp”.The Final Solution was a policy of the Nazi Party, a policy of deliberate and systematic genocide, and was formulated by Nazi leadership in the January of 1942 at the Wannsee Conference which was held near Berlin. Following this, the Holocaust took the lives of 90% of the Polish-Jewish population, two-thirds of the Jewish European population. That is around six million Jews in total.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was literacy a prime concern in the Massachusetts Bay colony?
Lera25 [3.4K]
The answer is:
So that the people could read the bible and protect them from sin
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ME BREAK DOWN THIS QUESTION! What tools and technology make you a more productive student?
Artemon [7]
The internet, computer based learning, online or e-based learning
5 0
3 years ago
What was a criticism of the USA Patriot Act when first enacted?
Ann [662]

Answer:

Criticism. Critics of the USA PATRIOT Act charged that several parts of the statute were unconstitutional or invited abuse by federal authorities.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to this quotation, what is against the law? “All charges made for any service rendered or to be rendered in the transp
    11·1 answer
  • Which clues helped archaeologists and historians document the existence of Sumer
    14·2 answers
  • Although nixion May not have ordered the break in he did order a ?
    9·1 answer
  • Regarding the magma carts, which statement is false?
    15·1 answer
  • By 1838, Andrew Jackson's policy toward American Indians resulted in the
    8·1 answer
  • In what ways are the paths of state budgets and federal budgets similar?
    5·2 answers
  • What is step 10 in this proof?
    12·2 answers
  • BRAINLIEST!!!!! 40 POINTS CHRISTMAS SPECIAL!!!
    10·1 answer
  • In the state of Georgia, how does the selection of juvenile court judges differ from the selection of judges for other state cou
    15·1 answer
  • How did new england settlers justify taking over indian land?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!