Answer:
The description again for the problem is listed throughout the section below on explanations.
Step-by-step explanation:
A 2012 survey conducted a week since Voting day because the local paper in Columbus asked voters whatever individual they might vote for the state attorney. 37% of respondents said that they'd vote for both the dem candidate. In reality, 41 percent voted for both the Democratic nominee on Elections Day.
The 37% is supported by a survey as well as being a factual estimate. The sample proportion is denoted by "P". Therefore,
⇒ P = 0.37
The specific proportion becomes supplied as a factor of 41% = 0.41. Since the importance of proportion is real. The proportion of community is represented as p or π
Hence p = 0.41.
Answer:
b) use a two-sided test instead of a one sided test.
Step-by-step explanation:
If we are using a significance level of 0.05, then the two-tailed test assigns half alpha to test for statistical significance in one direction and half alpha to test statistical significance in the other direction. This implies that .025 is present in each tail of the test statistical distribution. When using the two-tailed test, regardless of the direction of the relationship you assume, we test the possibility of the relationship in both directions.
The figure is a right angle
Complementary = sum of 90 degrees
35 + 2x - 5 = 90
30 + 2x = 90
2x = 60
Solution: x = 30
Yes I agree with that because you combined the terms in the monomial correctly and the degree of the monomial was greater then the degree of any other mono/binomials in the polynomial
Get ten of the packaged kind
