1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Jet001 [13]
3 years ago
12

A bond of the following elements would be of what type? Na + Cl Covalent or ionic

Biology
1 answer:
nikklg [1K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

ionic

Explanation:

Ionic bond:

It is the bond which is formed by the transfer of electron from one atom to the atom of another element.  

Both bonded atoms have very large electronegativity difference. The atom with large electronegativity value accept the electron from other with smaller value of electronegativity.

For example:

Sodium chloride is ionic compound. The electronegativity of chlorine is 3.16 and for sodium is 0.93. There is large difference is present. That's why electron from sodium is transfer to the chlorine. Sodium becomes positive and chlorine becomes negative ion.

There are one valance electron in sodium so it needed to lose one valance electrons to complete the octet while chlorine needed one electron to complete the octet. Thus electrons lost by sodium atom is gained by atom of chlorine and form ionic compound.

2Na + Cl₂ → 2NaCl

You might be interested in
A particular gene has two alleles, a dominant allele A and a recessive allele a. The frequency of allele A is 0.55. If the popul
bezimeni [28]

If p = frequency of A and q = frequency of a, then assuming H-W equilibrium we have

p + q = 1   ⇒   q = 1 - p = 1 - 0.55 = 0.45

Then the expected frequency of the heterozygous genotype Aa is 2pq = 2 • 0.55 • 0.45 = 0.495.

8 0
2 years ago
Scientists have discovered a fossil skeleton of a whale-like creature that lived in the early Eocene epoch. The skeleton shows a
soldier1979 [14.2K]
A. Ancestors of whales may once have been able to walk.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which part of the cell theory do these results most support:
Vlad1618 [11]
<h2>Hey There!</h2><h2>_____________________________________</h2><h2>Answer:</h2><h2>_____________________________________</h2>

\huge\textbf{Cell Theory}

the Cell Theory was give by German scientists, Schleiden and T.Shwan in 1839. It stated that,

  • All organism are composed of one or more cells

  • The cell is the structural and functional unit of life
  • It is a de novo structure, that means it COULD arise from non living thing which was incorrect.

It was corrected by the German pathologist  Rudolf Virchow in 1855. He made a convincing case, corrected and added the third point of the cell theory. It is,

  • Cells can arise only by a division of pre-existing cell. It is <u>NOT</u> a de novo structure.

Cell theory brought a great evolution in the field of biology which established the function of organism is the result of activities and interaction of the cell units.

<h2>_____________________________________</h2>

\huge\textbf{Question:}

  • <u>Flask 1</u>: It is observed that there are no micro-organism, this is because the meat is sealed and no micro-organism could enter through it.
  • <u>Flask 2</u>: It is observed that there are micro-organism present because meat is not sealed but open.
  • <u>Flask 3</u>: As the S tube is used, the micro-organism are not able to reach the meat because of the curvy path

These observations support the  point that<u> cells could arise only by a division of pre-existing alive cells</u> because in Flask 1 when there were no micro-organism present so there was no organisms found so no micro-organism arised, In flask 3 the S tube was used so no micro-organism could reach the meat thus there were no organism there which could divide to reproduce. The flask 2 was open, so the micro organisms reached the meat so they divided which means Cells can only arise by a division of pre-existing cells.

<h2><u>_____________________________________</u></h2><h2>Best Regards,</h2><h2>'Borz'</h2>

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Justify your choice of an objective to use when starting your observation of the euglena wet mount; of the euglena are swimming
IgorC [24]

Answer: If the Euglena is kept on the wet mount and it is sliding towards the left on the mount then to observe the Euglena in the microscope it wet mount should be slide towards right.

The movement of Euglena can be slowed down doing this. This will help us to observe it under microscope inspite of its movement.

Compound microscope is used to view Euglena.

3 0
3 years ago
What is the disadvantage of plasmolysis to the terrestrial plants?​
melisa1 [442]

Answer:

technical of plants living on the land or on the ground,so floppy plant.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The levels of organization for structure and function in the human body from least complex to most complex are
    9·1 answer
  • How do bicarbonates influence biotic factors
    13·2 answers
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum -what is the function
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these is an abiotic factor of an aquarium system
    5·1 answer
  • An earthquake decimates a ground-squirrel population. The surviving population happens to have broader stripes on average than t
    8·1 answer
  • The part of the neuron that carries impulses away from the cell body is called a(n
    13·1 answer
  • Serena is mixing a material into a beaker filled with a liquid. She notices that the material seems to disappear into the liquid
    7·1 answer
  • Why some organisms can survive without food ingestion for several months but can not survive without oxygen for a few minutes?​
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is correct regarding engineering maize plants with a herbicide-resistance gene using Agrobacte
    11·1 answer
  • Someone help me please
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!