Answer:
i believe its 24 in for the other leg
Step-by-step explanation:
<span>This question's solution is based on two context. First off, the probability of any events or occurrence cannot be greater than 1. If the question demands finding the probability that the proportion of all thickness (X) is less than 1.5 given the available data (mu and rho) then that would practically be impossible. It would only be feasible to ask, "if it were less than 1" My point is, suppose X is 1.3 which is actually less than 1.5, then we have a contradiction because our probability of occurrence or non-occurrence cannot be greater than 1.On the other hand suppose X is 0.2, then it will be pretty easy to input the formula to get valuable results.</span>
Answer:
AA
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
It increases x3.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's say the fraction to begin with was 100/100. Ignore the fact that it isn't fully reduced and it is an improper fraction.
10% of 100 is 10, so the numerator is now 90 (decrease=get smaller; 100-10=90).
70% of 100 is 70, so the denominator is now 30 (decrease=get smaller; 100-70=30).
Our fraction is now 90/30 which, when fully reduced, equals 3.00. Since 100/100 equals 1.00, it has increased by 2.00 (3x bigger).
