Answer:
He hires 8 workers
Explanation:
The total cost is $1600 for 5,000 chickens minus the fixed cost of $800, which equals $800. The total cost is total of fixed cost and variable cost as in absence of production the total variable cost is zero so from this we can conclude that total fixed cost is zero.
Then divide the total variable cost ($800) buy what Ralph pays his workers ($100), which comes to 8.
Cost of machine = $1,000
=
= $1,492.11
)=
= $75.13
Total NPV = -1000+1492.11+75.13 = $567.24 ≈ $567
Answer:
It's best to invest in the second economy
Explanation:
The question does not provide information on the hypothetical economic expectations of the two economies, but as a risk-averse investor, it's a better idea to try to "spread" the risk instead of concentrating it.
In the first economy, conditions might or might not be good. If they are good, returns will be extraordinary because all stocks will provide good returns, but if conditions take a turn for the worse, all stocks prices will fall and the financial consequences will be catastrophic.
In the second economy, results might never be as good as in the first economy, but they also will not ever be as bad. The risk is spread between various stocks, and while some may fall in price, others will rise, and viceversa. For a risk-adverse investor, this a far better option.
Answer:
b. A deduction from net income in determining cash flows from operating activities.
Explanation:
An increase in prepaid expenses is deducted from Net Income. The reason behind it very simple and no rocket science is there. Lets take Insurance as a prepaid expense. You Paid in-advance for Insurance, it increase your current asset that is Prepaid Insurance BUT at the same time cash went out of the Business.
I hope I made it clear to you. If you still have any queries, feel free to ask me.
Thanks!
Answer:
It is given that in an oligopolistic market, there are at first five firms. At the point when the quantity of fums diminishes to three, it implies that the all out yield will likewise decrease. It is on the grounds that, all the makers are delivering separated items. The inventory of merchandise won't increment in light of the fact that the makers would have expanded the creation before, if that was conceivable. Hence, the balance amount will fall and in view of decrease in amount, cost will increase.
Thus, equilibrium price will likely <u>increase</u> and the equilibrium quantity will likely <u>decrease.</u>
