The correct product should have been:
<span>(–4x + 9)2 = </span>(-4x)2 + 2(-4x)(9) + 9^2 = 16x6 - 72x +81
The result is a trinomial and not a binomial nor a difference of two squares.
So, the answer is:
C = Kylie did not understand that this is a perfect square trinomial, and she did not determine the product correctly.
<u>Supposing 60 out of 100 scores are passing scores</u>, the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all scores that are passing is (0.5, 0.7).
- The lower limit is 0.5.
- The upper limit is 0.7.
In a sample with a number n of people surveyed with a probability of a success of 
, and a confidence level of 
, we have the following confidence interval of proportions.
In which
z is the z-score that has a p-value of 
.
60 out of 100 scores are passing scores, hence 
95% confidence level
So 
, z is the value of Z that has a p-value of 
, so 
.
The lower limit of this interval is:
The upper limit of this interval is:
The 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all scores that are passing is (0.5, 0.7).
- The lower limit is 0.5.
- The upper limit is 0.7.
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/16807970
Answer:
the answer is 2.90
Step-by-step explanation:
Picture a rectangle, if one side is 3.4 then the other side 3.4. Add those two togerther gives you 6.8. Now you can subtract 6.8 from the perimeter which is 12.6 then that gives you 5.8. Then you split the 5.8 which give you 2.90 which is the length of the rectangle. So if you label all the sides of the rectangle like this 3.4 + 3.4 + 2.90 + 2.90 = 12.6
7/100 = 0.07
0.07 * 12.5 = 0.88
20/100 = 0.2
0.2 * 12.5 = 2.5
2.5 + 0.88 = 3.38
3.38 + 12.50 = 15.88
You spend a total of $15.88.
I think
J,BB,S
(I shortened name to letter)
