Did the Native Americans The pilgrims encountered lived in tipis and traveled on horseback?

2 answers:

8 0

Answer: The fields Indians lived in tipis. Indians in New England would have solidified to death in tipis. Furthermore, obviously stallions are not indigenous to the New World, so Indians didn't have them until the point that the White Man brought them. In any case, the Pilgrims were not the main Europeans in the New World, by any extend of the creative ability, so it's conceivable a few Indians had stallions by at that point. When we think about the word 'Indian' we promptly get a photo of a fields Indian, the Sioux or the Lakota. I think this is generally a direct result of our extraordinary legacy of western motion pictures about cowhands and Indians. The Indians on the East Coast were altogether different from that photo of buckskins, interlaces, plumes in the hair, and so on. The entire story of the Pilgrims is covered in myth and false history. For a certain something, they weren't generally Pilgrims. They weren't even truly Puritans! They were a chip assemble from the standard Puritan people group, calling themselves 'Precisionists'. They didn't come here to build up a group of religious opportunity, however one that they could keep running by their own particular religion. They didn't put stock in the partition of chapel and state (as our establishing fathers did), they trusted the congregation WAS the state. In any case, at that point a considerable measure of the American history we learn in primary school and secondary school is this way, more a teaching than an instruction. When you examine American history in school you need to unlearn all you've been shown up until this point.

aleksley [76]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

They were nomadic and moved from place to place.

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

The Venn diagram shows all of the elements in sets A, B and ξ. Find the elements in (A ∩ B) U (A U B)’

marusya05 [52]

This is impossible to answer without knowing what the sets A and B contain (and what ξ even refers to - universal set?).

However, we have

(A U B)' = A' ∩ B'

so that

(A ∩ B) U (A U B)' = (A ∩ B) U (A' ∩ B') = (A U A') ∩ (B U B')

If ξ is indeed the universal set, then both A U A' = ξ and B U B' = ξ, so we end up with ξ ∩ ξ = ξ.

8 0

2 years ago

Austin's truck has a mass of 2000 kg when traveling at 22.0 m/s, it brakes to a stop in 4.0 s. show that the magnitude of the br

olga2289 [7]

Since F=m•a, you want to show that a = -5.5

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Given f(x) and g(x) are inverse functions. If f(-2)=1 then g(1)=-2 True False

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

True.

The y-axis of the f(x) must equal to the x-axis of g(x)

The x-axis of the f(x) must equal to the y-axis of g(x)

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I need help please answer these two questions for me! Will give points.

jarptica [38.1K]

Answer:

7.) 7

10.) 0

Step-by-step explanation:

When it means "evaluate the function", it's in essence asking us to see what the function spits out when we feed it a certain input. Our inputs are our x values, which spit out a y value.

Evaluating the function when x = 1:

Let's look at where the function has an x value of 1. We see it near the bottom of the table and see the y value associated with the input is 7. So when the function is fed 1 as an input, it spits out 7.

Evaluating the function when f(x) = - 2:

This one is a weird because of the new notation. Just think of it as some value of f, which we don't know (so we represent it as an x-variable) must equal -2. So let's look at our table to find out where our output is -2. We find that when f(x) = -2 the input is 0. So the input which gives -2 is 0.

7 0

2 years ago

Need help on this, need help now D:

baherus [9]

Answer:

$\sqrt{34}$