I know filters, so I know it is Saturation.
The correct answer: Yes, mobile-style apps can run in a personal computer's desktop.
That is possible by means of a desktop application called emulatator. An emulator like Bluestacks allows a personal computer to run mobile-style apps by acting as a virtual drive in the personal computer's harddisk.
Emulation is successful if the system requirements of the mobile-application is met by the personal computer's system attributes such as Random Access Memory abundance, Random Access Memory speed, Processing speed (in some cases core abundance e.g. core 2) etc.
Some mobile-applications do not work in the personal computer's desktop, however, if this application requires platform specific functions such as mobile device's network provider etc.
Was this in reference to literal audio archives? If so, I don't see any cons beside possible copyright infringement.
If you're talking about the codecs themselves, then I can do that.
<span>Pros:
</span>- Widespread acceptance. Supported in nearly all hardware devices, and continually adopted by newer ones.
- Faster decoding. Much more so than FLAC, Vorbis, etc.
- Relaxed licensing schedule.
<span>Cons:
</span><span>
</span>- Lower quality and efficiency than most modern codecs. (To be fair, never really noticed this one).
- Sometimes the maximum bitrate isn't enough.
- Pretty much void/unusable for high definition audio (higher than <span>48kHz).</span>
Answer:
"Private" is the right solution.
Explanation:
- Application servers supplied sometimes over the World wide web or through a personal corporate network as well as to chosen customers rather than the community benefit of the entire, is termed as the private cloud.
- It provides companies with the advantages of a cloud environment that include self-checkout, adaptability as well as flexibility.
