C) your stressed is the answer
Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
Answer:
Some advice I would give to someone experiencing organizational change would be to just run with it. Change can suck sometimes and other times it can be great, but at a workplace, normally you have no say in changes so it wouldn't be great to risk your position or your job to speaking out against it. If you are confident in speaking out against certain problems, then go with it, but I normally just run with anything that changes. I get really scared and anxious of change myself, but it happens in life and there is nothing you can do to really stop it.
Explanation:
Answer: Ok so there's no number or letter answers but the answer is C. Hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Answer:
Hi there!
The answers are stated below:
Emulation- Doing what someone older does
Positive reinforcement- smiling when someone does something good
Social exclusion- Ignoring someone
