1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alecsey [184]
4 years ago
14

The correlation coefficient for poor hearing and loud music in a group of people is 0.67. Analyze the following statement: Poor

hearing is caused by listening to loud music. Is this a reasonable conclusion?
Mathematics
1 answer:
Montano1993 [528]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Correlation does not mean <em>causation</em> even after having a relatively high correlation coefficient as a result.

Step-by-step explanation:

Correlation and causation are not the same. Correlation does not mean that variations in one variable <em>cause</em> variations in the second variable. Instead, correlation considers that variations in one variable <em>corresponds</em> with variations of the second variable. No more.

Correlation is an important first step to establish that one variable possibly can cause some effect on the other, but it is not a definitive answer to this question. It is crucial to find other possible factors that can explain what causes some effect.

As a conclusion, a positive and relative high correlation coefficient does not necessarily mean causation. It simply tells us that some study found that people that listen to loud music are also people with poor hearing problems, and possibly a cause to the latter variable is to listen loud music repeatedly, but it is a must to find other possible factors before definitely concluding that.

You might be interested in
Jason needs 10 cups of milk to make a chocolate shake for his family. His measuring device measures liquids by the pint. If 1 pi
V125BC [204]
It should be about 5 pints
7 0
3 years ago
Which is the more reasonable measurement of the distance between the tracks on a railroad: 1.435 ⋅ 10−3 mm or 1.435 ⋅ 103 mm? Ju
SVEN [57.7K]
The best answer is 1.435 ·103 because while they both are really small for a rail road track that one is bigger. the final answer for that is 147.805mm.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write number 0.0082 in scientific notation​
Ede4ka [16]

Answer: 8.2×10^-3

Move the decimal over three places to eliminate unnecessary numbers (0s). Since you are moving the decimal to the right it will be 10 to a negative number.

8 0
3 years ago
Miguel is pouring liquid into a container that is 4 1/2 inches long by 3 1/2 inches wide by 2 inches high. How many cubic inches
Anastaziya [24]
31.5 cubic inches of liquid.
8 0
3 years ago
Mrs. Edington is buying a new big screen television she made an initial payment of $50 and paid a total of 890/12 months how muc
vampirchik [111]
Dtokgdlydkdggld lufyofyldoryult
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which must be true? BMZ CMZ ZBM ZCM
    10·1 answer
  • AB is tangent to O. If AO=12 and BC=25 what is AB ? The diagram is not to scale.
    13·1 answer
  • Please answer this question only if you know the answer! 25 points and brainliest!
    7·1 answer
  • What are equivelent froctions of. 7/12
    6·2 answers
  • Please help hdhdhdhd
    7·2 answers
  • Is (2,3),(1,5),(2,7) a function
    7·1 answer
  • Jake cut a pipe that was 17 1/2 inches long into 5 equal pieces how long should each piece .assuming there was no waste how long
    12·1 answer
  • 1 3/4 + 1 3/4 hasilnya adalah
    8·1 answer
  • When you think about a dopamine detox (limiting or restricting high dopamine activities like watching You.Tube videos, playing v
    7·1 answer
  • Elaina ran on a treadmill for 30 minutes during her workout today. She programmed the machine so that she would be running 1 mil
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!