Answer:
I don't think this is a real math equation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello from MrBillDoesMath!
Answer:
-1/16
Discussion:
Rewrite
((1/4 + 1/x)/(4+x)) as
(1/4 + 1/x) * (1/(4+x)) = => put num. over common denom,
( (x+4)/4x) * (1/(4+x)) = => cancel (x+4) from num. and denom.
(1/4x)
So as x ->-4, (1/4x) approaches ( 1/ ( 4 * (-4) ) ) = -1/16
Thank you,
MrB
If the Hansens want to reduce their expected estate tax liability prior to the death of either of the spouses, they could initiate a Marital Transfer.
<h3>What is a marital transfer?</h3>
A Marital transfer simply means that the Hansens should bequest their assets to each each other in case either of them die.
If this happens, the surviving spouse will not be charged any estate taxes because bequests to spouses are not subject to taxation.
To do this, the Hansens should put it into both of their wills that they plan to gift/ bequest their assets to their spouse if they die.
The big disadvantage of using a marital transfer however, is that the estate will still be subject to taxes when the surviving spouse dies. All the estate taxes that had been avoided would then be incurred by the estate but only after the death of both spouses.
In conclusion, they should use a marital transfer.
Find out more on estate taxes at brainly.com/question/6362495
#SPJ1
Andrew can buy maximum 3 meals this weekend.
From given question,
Andrew must spend less than 53$ on meals during the weekend.
He has already spent 21$ on meals costing 8$ average.
Let x, the number of meals
So, we get an inequality,
8x + 21 < 53
We need to find the number of meals he can buy this weekend.
From above inequality,
⇒ 8x + 21 < 53
⇒ 8x < 53 - 21
⇒ 8x < 32
⇒ x < 4
This means, from 1 to 3 meals.
Therefore, Andrew can buy maximum 3 meals this weekend.
Learn more about an inequality here:
brainly.com/question/19003099
#SPJ4
