Luke approaches you before class and expresses his frustration about having done so poorly on yesterday's exam. "I studied for h
ours and hours," he tells you. "I guess I'm just not a very good test taker." You know that your test was a good measure of what you taught your students. You also know that students seldom do poorly on your tests simply because they are poor test takers. Considering the textbook's discussion of study strategies, what other possible explanation might you give Luke as to why he thought he knew the material well yet earned a low test score?
Luke didn't have an effective strategy to monitor his comprehension
Explanation:
Whenever people experienced failures, our first defense mechanism will most likely influence us to blame external factors rather than acknowledging there might be something wrong with the way we conduct things.
In luke's case, he might developed that view because he never really been exposed to an effective method that brought success to his test scores. Because of this, the only outcomes that he's experienced are only failures and he never really found a strategy that can work to overcome it.
To fix this, Luke need to communicate with other successful students and ask their study method in order to conduct a trial run and find which method suit him the most.
Answer: Adventurous person is lead by the willingness to achieve
Explanation:
What I mean is that for you to get sound grades ,your ability to plan ahead of time is some how needed and with accuracy but this will not be ascertained by a none adventurous person, a saying once said ‘’A SAFE IN TIME SAVES TIME’’ thanks.
Agnosticism is the view that the existence of God, of the divine or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable. Another definition provided is the view that "human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God exists or the belief that God does not exist."
