An elected prime minister controls the government of burma (myanmar).
The history of Myanmar, previously called Burma, began with the Pagan nation in 849. although each state has constantly been at struggle with their neighbors, it was the largest South East Asian Empire during the 16th century under the Taungoo Dynasty. The thousand-year line of Burmese monarchy ended with the 0.33 Anglo-Burmese war in 1885. The usa became then administered as a part of British India till 1937. British Burma started with its respectable reputation at the colonial map that marks its new borders containing over 100 ethnicities. It was named Burma after the dominant ethnic group Bamar, who make up 68 percent of the populace.In 1961, U Thant, Burma's permanent representative to the United nations and former secretary to the high Minister, become elected Secretary-general of the United nations; he became the primary non-Westerner to head any global organisation and would serve as UN Secretary-wellknown for ten years.[5] among the Burmese to work at the UN while he become Secretary-general was a young Aung San Suu Kyi.
Learn more about The government of Burma here:-
brainly.com/question/540208
#SPJ4
Answer:
Dont listen to anybodys opinions about you, they may be struggling about something or mad and wantt to take it out on someone innocent, like you. the answer is china btw
Explanation:
Answer:
my internet aint working
Explanation:
for some reason my internet wont work and i cant look anything up I think it was some sort of seashell top tho
The entire situation with the colonies revolting from British control wouldn't have happened without the Seven Years War (of which the section happening in the North American colonies is called the "French and Indian War").
The British only raised taxes, which is the thing that first upset the American Colonies, to pay down the debt from fighting that war.
The British wouldn't have been considering allowing the Catholic settlers from Canada to move into the Ohio Valley and to keep those from the American Colonies out if they hadn't won the war, since Canada would still have been French.
The American colonists would have had less grievances with the British for the way that the leadership of the British armies messed up in the Colonies if the war hadn't happened.
The American colonists wouldn't have had as many experienced combatants and leaders (Washington being a huge one that learned his skill in war fighting for the British) without the earlier war taking place.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Altruism is beneficial at group level. A group having lot of altruists has greater chances of survival than a groups with fewer or no altruists.
