The fallacy that is described by your friend's belief that there is no more segregation is B) legalistic fallacy.
<h3>What is legalistic fallacy?
</h3>
This is the belief that there is no more racism in a certain sector simply because there are laws that exist against that sort of racism.
Your friend here does not believe in racist segregation because there are laws against it so this must be a legalistic fallacy.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more on racial fallacies at brainly.com/question/26683818.
The worth attached to the feelings experienced by Riley's parents is an example of<u> "an intrinsic value".</u>
There are two thoughts of intrinsic value. Something can be said to have intrinsic value on the off chance that it is either:
Valuable in itself
Valued by somebody for its own particular purpose
On the off chance that something has intrinsic value in the principal sense, this implies the universe is by one means or another a superior place for that thing existing or happening.
This first thought of intrinsic value is questionable. Numerous philosophers would state that it looks bad to discuss things being significant in themselves except if they are really esteemed by somebody. Indeed, even delight or joy are just inherently significant in light of the fact that they are experienced by somebody.
