Answer:
A. Frictional Unemployment
B. Structural Unemployment
C. Cyclical Unemployment
Explanation:
A. Frictional Unemployment refers to people moving between jobs which is the case for the first scenario
B. Structural Unemployment is a type of unemployment when structure of the economy changes and outsourcing also comes under this
C. Cyclical Unemployment is caused by the movements of business cycle people are laid off when economy is facing recession i.e decrease in investment.
Answer:
Since a perfectly competitive firm must accept the price for its output as determined by the product’s market demand and supply, it cannot choose the price it charges. Rather, the perfectly competitive firm can choose to sell any quantity of output at exactly the same price. This implies that the firm faces a perfectly elastic demand curve for its product: buyers are willing to buy any number of units of output from the firm at the market price. When the perfectly competitive firm chooses what quantity to produce, then this quantity—along with the prices prevailing in the market for output and inputs—will determine the firm’s total revenue, total costs, and ultimately, level of profits.
Answer:
This case has similarities to the instances of Cesarini v. the US, 296 F.Supp. 3 (N.D. Ohio 1969), is a noteworthy case decided by the U.S. Locale Court for the Northern District of Ohio, where the court decided that treasure trove property is remembered for net salary for the assessment year when it was found.
A. TAX RESEARCH ISSUES :
1. Regardless of whether charges on the monies were due in the year the piano was bought or in the year the monies were found?
2. Regardless of whether the monies found in the piano are includable as gross income of the parties?
3. Regardless of whether offended parties are qualified for capital gains treatment?
B. Keywords:
- Monies found
- Cesarini v. United States
- Treasure
- Piano
- 26 U.S. Code § 102
- Gross Income
- Gift
Answer:
B. The lessor does not have the right to stop delivery in transit due to the lessee's breach of the lease agreement; instead, the lessor must deliver the goods to the lessee in spite of the breach, and then sue the lessee for damages.
Explanation:
During the transit of goods, if the lessor learns of a breach of the lease agreement, he has every right to stop the delivery of the goods in transit by notifying the goods carrier or bailee. Since the carrier of the goods reports directly to the lessor, once he receives instructions from the lessor to stop delivery of goods, and he still has sufficient time, the delivery should be stopped.
Once the goods are reclaimed, the lessor can then decide to sue to recover damages. He can also, decide to cancel the contract at that point
Answer:
$16,000
Explanation:
Data provided
Ending cash balance = $72,000
Beginning cash balance = $51,000
Cash receipts = $135,000
Cash disbursements = $130,000
The computation of cash borrowing is shown below:-
Ending cash balance = Beginning cash balance + Cash receipts - Cash disbursements + Cash borrowings
$72,000 = $51,000 + $135,000 - $130,000 + Cash borrowings
Cash borrowings = - $72,000 + $51,000 + $135,000 - $130,000
= $186,000 - $202,000
= $16,000
