Answer:
<h3>-10⇜</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
AB=-6×-5÷-1×3
AB= 30÷-3
<h3>AB= -10⇚</h3>
Answer:
No, This is not a valid Probability Distribution
Step-by-step explanation:
Probability [Neighbour walks with Beagle] = 20%
Probability [Neighbour walks with Golden Retriever] = 70%
Probability [Neighbour walks alone] = 30%
Disjoint Events are the events that have zero probability of occurring together. If all the three above items are disjoint, it means that it can never happen that two of them happen together.
The total (summed) probability of a valid probability distribution, with disjoint sets = 1 . In given case, total probability = 0.2 + 0.7 + 0.3 = 1.2 ; i.e > 1.
So, this probability distribution with stated disjoint events is not a Valid Probability distribution.
B. Sometimes because in learned that it isn't always that way.
Answer:
Number 40 appeared in Pattern B. Also, according to the rule, each pattern will increase.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's develop each sequence. Remembe that the rule is "add 15", that's what we need to create each sequence starting from the given initial number.
Pattern A.

Pattern B.

Pattern C.

As you can observe, number 40 appeared in Pattern B. Also, according to the rule, each pattern will increase
Answer:
Yes, they are independent because P(Texas) ≈ 0.45 and P(Texas/brand A) ≈ 0.45.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that a taste test asks people from Texas and California which pasta they prefer, brand A or brand B. The table is given in the question.
A person is randomly selected from those tested.
And we have find that are being from Texas and preferring brand A independent events or not.
Firstly, we know that these two events will be independent when;
P(Texas) = P(Texas/brand A)
Now, P(Texas) = 
= 
≈ 0.45
Also, P(Texas/brand A) = 
= 
= 
≈ 0.45
Therefore, being from Texas and preferring brand A are independent events because P(Texas) ≈ 0.45 and P(Texas/brand A) ≈ 0.45.
