All categories

3 years ago

Abigail has 16 apples she eats 2 apples per day.let y be the apples remaining as a function of the number of week,x

Mathematics

1 answer:

Greeley [361]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Let X be the number of weeks.

2x - 16 = 14

we add 16 on both sides.

2x = 30

now we divide 2 on both sides to get rid of the 2 to the x, we want to get x on its own.

X = 15

You might be interested in

) The density of oil in a circular oil slick on the surface of the ocean at a distance of r meters from the center of the slick

Feliz [49]

Answer:

Therefore the mass of the of the oil is 409.59 kg.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us consider a circular disk. The inner radius of the disk be r and the outer diameter of the disk be (r+Δr).

The area of the disk

=The area of the outer circle - The area of the inner circle

= $\pi (r+\triangle r)^2- \pi r^2$

$=\pi [r^2+2r\triangle r+(\triangle r)^2-r^2]$

$=\pi [2r\triangle r+(\triangle r)^2]$

Since (Δr)² is very small, So it is ignorable.

∴ $A=2\pi r\triangle r$

The density $\delta (r)= \frac{40}{1+r^2}$

We know,

Mass= Area× density

$=(2r \pi \triangle r)(\frac{40}{1+r^2}})$

Total mass $M=\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{80r_i\pi }{1+r^2}\triangle r_i$

Therefore

$\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{80r_i\pi }{1+r^2}\triangle r_i=\int_0^5 \frac{80r\pi }{1+r^2}dr$

$=40\pi[ln(1+r^2)]_0^5$

$=40\pi [ln(1+5^2)-ln(1+0^2)]$

$=40\pi ln(26)$

= 409.59 kg (approx)

Therefore the mass of the of the oil is 409.59 kg.

3 0

2 years ago

Pls help One simple easy question

lozanna [386]

Answer:

c not hundred percent sure

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If B(x)=-1,then what is x

jekas [21]

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Which of the five measures of center (the mean, the median, the trimmed mean, the weighted mean, and the mode) can be calculated

almond37 [142]

Mean because it is the average

3 0

2 years ago

Angie and Becky each completed a separate proof to show that the measures of vertical angles AKG and HKB are equal. Who complete

Helga [31]

Answer:

Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."

Step-by-step explanation:

Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.

Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.

However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".

The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.

Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.

6 0

2 years ago