Answer:
Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative was a good idea; everything Reagan did was good for our country.
Explanation:During the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan initiated the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), an anti-ballistic missile program (ABMP) that was designed to shoot down nuclear missiles in space. Otherwise known as “Star Wars,” SDI sought to create a space-based shield that would render nuclear missiles obsolete.
But something people do not talk about is how he was interested in the ABMP dating back to 1967 when as governor of California, he paid a visit to physicis Edward Tellert the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Reagan reportedly was very taken by Teller’s briefing on directed-energy weapons (DEWs), such as lasers and microwaves. Teller argued that DEWs could potentially defend against a nuclear attack, characterizing them as the “third generation of nuclear weapons” after fission and thermonuclear weapons, respectively (Rhodes 179). According to George Shultz, the Secretary of State during Reagan’s presidency, the meeting with Teller was “the first gleam in Ronald Reagan’s eye of what later became the Strategic Defense Initiative” (Shultz 261). This account was also confirmed by Teller, who wrote, “Fifteen years later, I discovered that [Reagan] had been very interested in those ideas” (Teller, 509).
Reference
NMNSH, (2018). Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Atomic Heritage Foundation. Retrieved fromhttps://www.atomicheritage.org/history/strategic-defense-initiative-sdi
Depends on where you are if your in america your fine in russia your will get aressted or killed
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Texas has a right to govern itself.
Any quarantine of a sovereign state can turn into war fairly quickly, especially when the country in question has deep alliances with other, perhaps more powerful, countries.
Explanation:
If the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics<span> had </span>nonappointive<span> to run the quarantine/blockade, the </span>US<span> would have </span>laid-off<span> on Soviet ships. </span>this could are an<span> act of war, </span>and therefore the state<span> would have had no </span>selection however to reply<span>. </span>this could<span> have dragged in </span>each<span> sides' allies, triggering </span>a replacement warfare<span>. And </span>an increase<span> to a nuclear exchange would </span>virtually actually have<span> occurred, as whichever </span>aspect<span> was losing </span>in a very typical<span> war would have had </span>very little selection, however,<span> use nukes or surrender.</span>
