Dr. López has probably found
"mirror neurons".
A mirror neuron is a neuron that flames both when a creature acts and when the creature watches a similar activity performed by another. Hence, the neuron "mirrors" the conduct of alternate, as if the onlooker were itself acting. Such neurons have been straight forwardly seen in primate species.
I think the answer would be d
<span> Warren Harding defeating James Cox, 1920 (26.17% margin)</span>
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
The correct answer is that it's opposite in meaning!( the correct answer is A).
B: the same in meaning - this would be a "synonym", not an antonym.
C: this would be a homonym: two words pronounced the same but with a different meaning.
