1. (0, 1) , (2, -9) , (3, -14) , (-6, 31)
2. The amount she pays back each week.
Answer:
14
Step-by-step explanation: 2(4x+6)=
\,\,34-3x
34−3x
Since HJ is a midsegment, twice HJ is equal to EG.
8x+12=
8x+12=
\,\,34-3x
34−3x
Distribute.
8x+12=
8x+12=
\,\,-3x+34
−3x+34
Communicative property to change the order
\color{red}{+3x}\phantom{+12}\phantom{=}
+3x+12=
\,\,\color{red}{+3x}\phantom{+34}
+3x+34
+3x to both sides.
11x+12=
11x+12=
\,\,34
34
\phantom{11x}\color{red}{-12}\phantom{=}
11x−12=
\,\,\color{red}{-12}
−12
-12 to both sides.
11x=
11x=
\,\,22
22
\frac{11x}{11}=
11
11x
=
\,\,\frac{22}{11}
11
22
Divide both sides by 11
x=
x=
\,\,2
2
Value of x
HJ=
HJ=
\,\,4x+6
4x+6
Value of HJ
HJ=
HJ=
\,\,4(2)+6
4(2)+6
Plug in x.
HJ=
HJ=
\,\,8+6
8+6
Multiply.
HJ=
HJ=
\,\,14
14
Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
Answer:
5 kg
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The total cost is 
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
x-----> the number of tulips
y-----> the number of daffodils
C-----> the total cost
we know that


substitute the value of x

Find the total cost

substitute
