Answer:
similarity; proximity
Explanation:
You tend to perceive the elements in the first example as two units because of the law of similarity, which states that elements that are similar to each other tend to be seen as one group. You tend to perceive the elements in the second example as five units because of the law of proximity, which states that elements that are closely placed together are usually seen as one group even when they are within a larger group.
Hope it helps ya............
Answer:
c. Agent Lopez’s entire compensation must be recouped because Ralph disenrolled within 3 months of enrollment.
Explanation:
Health plans, such as Top Choice Medicare Advantage, provide a document listing all clauses relating to the plan, such as withdrawal deadlines, service agreements, reimbursement, among other things. In the case of Top Choice Medicare Advantage, there is a clause stating that the agent responsible for enrolling the client in the plan will have compensation restored if the client cancels the enrollment within 3 months. With this, we can conclude that, in relation to the case shown in the above question, Agent Lopez's full compensation must be recovered because Ralph annulled himself within the three month period.
Answer:
In the understanding of this court case, where the plaintiff (L.M.) filed a lawsuit against Pacheco on sexual abuse, the court ruled that the perpetration of the abhorrent act committed did not have to do with Pacheco´s ´´scope of employment´´ as the act happened outside the boundaries of the church and not within his working hours. However, if the plaintiff were to argue that in fact this conduct happened within the scope of employment, she would have to explain and convince that Pacheco was indeed responsible as it is a Pastor's duty and responsibility to guide and counsel at all hours, and not just limited to his church´s hours. A pastor is a figure of responsibility as a visible head for a community, not to mention that in some churches, a pastor is also a legal representative.
Employers should be held liable for the acts of their employees whenever there is a failure to supervise employees or some kind of misdemeanor is perpetrated within the employer´s work facilities or influential premises. These points of view however, are not stated by a lawyer/judicially, these are my personal observations after having researched on the case.
