Answer:
10 terms
Step-by-step explanation:
equate the sum formula to 55 and solve for n
n(n + 1) = 55 ( multiply both sides by 2 to clear the fraction )
n(n + 1) = 110 ← distribute parenthesis on left side
n² + n = 110 ( subtract 110 from both sides )
n² + n - 110 = 0 ← in standard form
Consider the factors of the constant term (- 110) which sum to give the coefficient of the n- term (+ 1)
the factors are + 11 and - 10 , since
11 × - 10 = - 110 and 11 - 10 = + 1 , then
(n + 11)(n - 10) = 0 ← in factored form
equate each factor to zero and solve for n
n + 11 = 0 ⇒ n = - 11
n - 10 = 0 ⇒ n = 10
However, n > 0 , then n = 10
number of terms which sum to 55 is 10
The reflection transformation in the question is a rigid transformation,
therefore, the image and the preimage are congruent.
The statements that are true are;
Reasons:
The given parameter are;
Triangle ΔABC is reflected across the line 2·X, to map onto triangle ΔRST
Required:
To select the true statements
Solution:
A reflection is a rigid transformation, therefore, the distance between corresponding points on the image and the preimage are equal.
Therefore;
AB = RS
BC = ST
AC = RT
Given that the image formed by a reflection is congruent to the preimage, we have;
ΔABC ≅ ΔRST
∠ABC ≅ ∠RST
m∠ABC = m∠RST by the definition of congruency
∠BCA ≅ ∠STR
m∠BCA = m∠STR by the definition of congruency
∠BAC ≅ ∠SRT
m∠BAC = m∠SRT by the definition of congruency
Therefore, the true statements are;
- <u>AB = RS</u>; Image formed by rigid transformation
- <u>∠ABC ~ ∠RST</u>; Definition of similarity
- <u>ΔABC = ΔRST</u>; By definition of congruency
- <u>m∠BAC = m∠SRT</u>; by the definition of congruency
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/11787764
1.666666666666667 to be exact, but rounded it is 1.66
Answer:
Yeah it's 10
Step-by-step explanation:
100/10=10
9514 1404 393
Answer:
5 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
A quick way to look at this is to compare the difference in hourly charge to the difference in 0-hour charge.
The first day, the charge is $3 more than $12 per hour.
The second day, the charge is $12 less than $15 per hour.
The difference in 0-hour charges is 3 -(-12) = 15. The difference in per-hour charges is 15 -12 = 3. The ratio of these is ...
$15/($3/h) = 5 h
The charges are the same after 5 hours.
__
If you write equations for the charges, they will look like ...
y1 = 15 + 12(x -1)
y2 = 3 + 15(x -1)
Equating these charges, we have ...
15 +12(x -1) = 3 + 15(x -1)
12x +3 = 15x -12 . . . . . . . . eliminate parentheses
15 = 3x . . . . . . . . . . add 12-12x
x = 15/3 = 5 . . . . . . divide by 3
You might notice that the math here is very similar to that described in words, above.
The charges are the same after 5 hours.
